Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (6781)	7/9/2002 11:33:37 PM
From: Edward W. Richmond	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

Hi, Jack. I have made several attempts to contact Michael Jacobs. I made contact with him briefly. He has pneumonia and is out of the office for a while. Hopefully, within the next two weeks, I will be able to discuss the items I forwarded to him. I'll keep this forum updated once we meet. While I like the PEMDE grant from the federal government and the focus on states with few barriers to increased sales, I am wondering about the projections for 2002 and 2003. Last time I spoke with management, there was no change in these projections. Regards, Ed

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (6781)	7/11/2002 8:34:14 AM
From: LOR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

Jack....you are such a pessimist ( ie. REALIST ) AND, unlike "yours truly" you have always been more diplomatic then "moi meme". I suspect Judy is stuck between a rock and a hard place and is merely trying to mimic the style and imaginative flair of the company's Flounder & chief. To be fair, PYNG "MAY" have revised their sales targets and, due to the heavy workload and the thousands of calls pouring in each day from curious "wanna be" customers just forgot or didn't have the time to let this forum know that reality had come back to bite them in their collective hind sides yet again! IT's tough to run a small potentially under capitalized company like PYNG on Army surplus....err, make that "hospital surplus" plant equipment and where the senior staff have to wear 5 or 6 hats simultaneously. It's very easy for people on the outside like you and I to point to their obvious weaknesses ( ie. mainly 1 M.J.???? ) I have discovered that PYNG is a very important part of my portfolio. Late at night I usually review my portfolio before turning in. This can be quite exciting and for the longest time I would have trouble falling asleep afterwards. THEN I discovered that PYNG could be a real LIFE SAVER for me!! These days, I make sure that PYNG is the LAST stock I update myself on before hitting the sack. As you know, there is very little that is new and exciting coming out of PYNG so that part of my review only takes a few seconds. THEN, I immediately go and re-read one or two of Mike Jacob's "fantasy posts" I have saved from the distant past....all the time muttering "same old...same old.... under my breath and PRESTO within seconds of starting to read that bilge I am half asleep......I immediately leave my work station and wander off to bed usually saying "$250,000,000 annual market" over and over again until my head hits the pillow.......By then I am out like a light having had my fill of "commedy" for the night! Over and out, LOR P.S.- Now, on top of his many other problems, we hear that poor Mike Jacobs is himself recovering from a medical setback! HONESTLY NOW.... Get well soon Mike! I may NOT like your management style OR your way with shareholders but your efforts to develop the FAST-1 over all these years can not be ignored. I'M STILL BETTING THAT SOONER OR LATER PYNG's SHIP WILL COME IN!! ......gosh it's 8:30 a.m. .....and suddenly I feel ..very tired again.....must be the PYNG Syndrome......zzzzzzz...zzzzzzz

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (6781)	7/15/2002 2:21:32 PM
From: LOR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

How to alleviate the “PYNG BOREDOM” Seeing as how “Executive Daydreams” tend to be published on a rather infrequent basis what can we news starved FAST-1 addicts do with the few minutes of spare time we have each day to better understand PYNG’s chances of survival in a world where yesterday’s invention is old before it is produced in any significant quantities? “Yours truly” just spent a delightful half hour looking over the: Resuscitation Research Laboratories website for details on Intraosseous Infusion devices etc, www2.utmb.edu After printing out the list I immediately moved over to the U.S. patent office website to read some of the patents referred to on the list. If readers would like to do this they can go to: patft.uspto.gov and simply copy the patent number for each item on the above list into the Patent “Number” search box A brief review follows: #3 device shows that patents for I.O. device products go back to at least 7/1918, #4 & 5 were issued in 1993 for “Sternum” application and #4 refers to sternum I.O. device patents going back to 1940, #10 --1999 patent refers to a “Rapid Vascular Drug Delivery” system developed by George C. Kramer of Galveston and Paul J. Hirsch who I associate with Cook Critical Care & the “Sur-Fast” product, #11 & 13 -- 1999 patents refer to “implantable I.O. Device” and in #11 they refer to none other then M. Jacob’s Patent Number 5312364 of 5/94 ( NOT the FAST-1 ) #12 -- 1999 patent for a computer controlled “Autoinfuser” I.O. device System WELL…… I guess the world continues to spin and advance as regards Intraosseous devices and systems” even without PYNG’s FAST-1. However, I must add ( tongue in cheek ) that it appears that the "University of Texas - Resuscitation Research Laboratories" may not be giving us the whole picture any more then PYNG and PYNG's affiliated institutions do! Will obsolescence of the FAST-1 be its death knell??? All the best Jack to you as well as the other "long sufferin" PYNG shareholders, LOR