Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (272381)	7/9/2002 10:41:10 PM
From: Arthur Radley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Anyone like to guess who posted this on SI in January, 2002...at 1:52 P.M. Anyone want to guess if this same indivdual takes any medicines that have been developed with federal funds, ridden on a interstate highway, flown on a US based airline, had kids in public schools, mailed a letter, used a telephone, has electric power in his home, will some day or is NOW taking SS funds, and NEVER SERVED IN ANY BRANCH OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY.. "Dear e.t. once again you take your thinking to lefty loon land. I made no mention of banking strategies and was responding to your comments on tax havens. It is the patriotic duty of all Americans not to give a penny our money to the Government. In business it is the duty of those who run the company to also not pay a penny of the shareholders money to the Government." Want to know who this person is, the one who proclaims that he is a true American? Yes...this PARTIOTIC AMERICAN!

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (272381)	7/9/2002 10:53:38 PM
From: Arthur Radley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

What is this world coming tooooo! The staunch defender of corporate America and Wall Street is NOW telling Shrub and his staff that they are stupid. Shrub! Do you get the feeling that people are beginning to think you are stupid, as if it wasn't common knowledge before? "Dobbs Report: Memo to Staff A few thoughts tonight for the White House staffers who worked on the president's speech. July 9, 2002: 7:29 PM EDT By Lou Dobbs, Lou Dobbs Moneyline NEW YORK (CNN) - A few thoughts tonight for the White House staffers who worked on the president's speech over the weekend while he was playing golf in Maine. You folks are supposed to be helping him, not serving him up as an easy target for the Democrats.... Do you really believe it was in the president's best interest to be seen on every news network playing the game of business, that is, golf, in the days before he was supposed to be the Great Reformer of business? And as for the speech, did you buy into the Democratic view that the president is too close to business for him to credibly be the reformer of big business? Is that why the president talked with so little passion, with so few specifics? Don't you realize the CEO/MBA president has a unique advantage in leading reform of corporate America and Wall Street? And which genius among you had the president go to Wall Street to make this too tepid speech on reform? How about instead the president summoning the leaders of corporate America, the stock exchanges, the business roundtable, the business council, and the other organizations representing big business into the Oval Office to get their direction on conscience, character and conduct from the nation's chief executive? How about the president simply telling them that there will be zero tolerance of corporate corruption, that the SEC and the Justice Department will use every existing law and tool at their disposal to root out criminals and convict them? That the leaders of every big corporation and national business organization will lead by both example and voice or lose the support of the administration? And who among you had the bright idea of creating another task force? There's already one task force working in Houston... it's called the Enron task force, and we haven't seen any results in seven months. Will you all finally figure out that the Justice Department and SEC have spent too many months investigating Enron, without any action? That the time for action is now? That the president's next speech on corporate ethics will have more power if it's preceded by indictments and arrests of, not a few bad apples or bad actors, but an ever growing list of corporate crooks? I can't wait for that next speech.