Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Constant Reader who wrote (17085)	7/10/2002 1:44:14 PM
From: Thomas M.	Respond to of 21057

You are right, it was not a treaty, it was actually just a cease-fire agreement. However, this enforces my point. The 1949 Armistace Agreement was in dispute. In the cease-fire following the 1967 war, the agreement was clarified, and no more shelling ensued. The military situation did not change, as the artillery were hardly moved. This comes from Israeli General Metityahu Peled, by the way. Somemore background on Israeli aggression in the Golan Heights: mideastfacts.com tom