Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (148046)	7/11/2002 12:14:25 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573080

Unless he is totally innocent of wrongdoing in the Harken mess, its a little like asking the fox to clean out the hen house. Let's look at this logically. What kind of "wrongdoing" could he have conceivably have been guilty of? It has been previously investigated (at least 3 times) as to whether he was working on inside information, and he has been shown to be free of wrongdoing. As to the late filing of the form, it is important to keep in mind that THAT would be criminal only if there was intent to defraud -- however, the fact the he filed the original return indicating his planned liquidation is proof positive there was no intent to defraud. You really aren't defending him after he explained away the Harkness problem by hesistatingly saying there can be confusion in accounting and not all accounting is "black and white". Funny, that's what his friends at ENE said too........I guess getting transparency is virtually impossible, huh? But I forget ole dubya is an honest injun, isn't he? Bottom line: What kind of wrongdoing could Bush conceivably be guilty of in this matter? How many times does it need to be investigated? Is three or more not enough? I'll let the investigation determine that......you know how that ole saying goes....... where there's smoke, there's fire.....or how about, it may be just the tip of the ole iceberg. You'd think after three years and three requests for explanation, he could at least have a good reason for not submitting the SEC info on time. But his crowd just doesn't think that stuff is real important. This is clearly an attempt on the part of the Democrats to smear Bush, just like was done with the racist ad in Texas during the campaign. And it pleases me to see it backfiring on the scoundrels who are doing it (Carville & Associates). Its Bushit and it needs to be exposed. Next we'll work on Cheney.........now how often do you see a CEO do an advertisement for an accounting firm? And guess which firm he went to bat for........cronism rules in corporate America. Thank God, Republicans are honest!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ted Enter symbols or keywords for search: QuotesStock TalkChartsNewsPeople Symbol Lookup Subject Titles Only Full Text Go to Top Terms of Use Got a comment, question or suggestion? Contact Silicon Investor.