Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : A@P VOTE: Guilty or Innocent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TripleT who wrote (568)	7/11/2002 5:29:55 PM
From: Captain Jack	Respond to of 717

No-- those that decide anything is OK if is to their or their idols benefit kind of piss me off. LOL! No-- only the one nick,, You never have and never will hear me look down upon anyone shorting. Shorting is not the only means of manipulating and Bubba should have those for company,, long or short. I have not 'slimed' (is that a word??) him-- he did a great job of that and needs no help. As I've often said-- if not proven guilty he will be out until his ego gets him in crap again. If proven guilty, it would make no difference WHO it was,, my hope is for the max sentence. BTW-- my portfolio is NOT in the shitter,, not great but certainly not the way you perceive.. Again--- I do NOT play pennys and have heard of few to none of the issues mentioned by others as his 'picks'.

To: TripleT who wrote (568)	7/11/2002 5:30:50 PM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 717

TTT, many of Anthony's most severe critics never traded much with him or against him, they just saw enough of his conduct to believe (in their personal opinion) that he was a childish, abusive, insecure, immature, disreputable, dishonest pathetic little rodent trying to overcome his personal demons through public antics and sucker in a crowd and a lot of bucks in the process. You want to believe he is Robin Hood, that's your business. Errol Flynn he ain't. That's from folks who knew AP from day one on SI in 1998. Check the threads. Find the posts where we traded against him and publish them, OK?

To: TripleT who wrote (568)	7/11/2002 5:31:21 PM
From: Smiling Bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 717

Amr often published good research. I never argued with that BUT, he always seemed to fail to mention it wasn't his research amr's timing in his calls was often way off. ONLY when he seemed to somehow??? know in adavance about an investigation to be announced was his timing improved. Coincidentally, they seemed to come after he allegedly established gov't contacts in early 2001 I know for a fact he's guilty of something, and greatly look forward to that finally coming to the public eye. Edit- I am excluded from posting on his thread. You guess why.