Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JustTradeEm who wrote (78902)	7/11/2002 6:54:01 PM
From: Bob White	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

JB, You are neither sincere nor accurate. It is obvious that you do not despise public squabbles or you would not have jumped on me with your half-concocted criticisms. To backtrack a bit, my earliest posts on this matter originated with the observation that there has been no request from Amr or his family for financial contributions nor has any proof been shown to support that a 'fund' is necessary or wanted, yet mmmary and mademoney went from hypothesizing that the Elgindys may need money to discussing it as though it was a forgone conclusion, which it still is not. To clarify, what I don't like is being misquoted -- again and again. Another thing I don't like is scam artists who use this forum to draw others into a con -- even a con as poorly conceived as this one is. I don't believe everyone "SHOULD" have a problem, but I recognized that your ego was preventing you from staying out of this public squabble, didn't I? In addition, I pointed out to you over and over that you are unable to comprehend what you read. So, while I don't expect that everyone "SHOULD" have a problem, there are instances where I have to concede that a problem or problems exist(s). Are you aware that your condition is recognized as denial? You failed to read enough of my interactions with mmmary and mademoney to gain an understanding before you started spewing advice. This was motivated by precisely what you accuse me of, [to paraphrase: I disagree, I say something, I'm a control freak.] Seems to me you're living in a glass house and you're throwing stones. With the comprehension and communication skills you've displayed so far, you may be farther ahead if you respond by kicking your dog. He may well see through your inconsistencies, but he can't point them out for all the world to view... As for witty rejoinders, you're hardly in a position to render judgment.