SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hmaly who wrote (84709)7/12/2002 7:34:19 AM
From: hmalyRespond to of 275872
 
Elmer, Re....gave Pete every opportunity to modify his absurd claim but he declined.<<<<<<<<<<<<

Upon reflection, maybe the absurd claim you asked Pete to refute was the 200,000 capacity part, not the 200,000 wafer starts. In addition that article doesn't say if the total capacity is normal total capacity, which I heard is 80% of every possible wafer start.



To: hmaly who wrote (84709)7/12/2002 8:30:42 AM
From: steve harrisRespond to of 275872
 
Elmer Re... gave Pete every opportunity to modify his absurd claim but he declined.<<<<<<<<<<<<<

What absurd claim. Read what Pete said.


Can you imagine how much effort and manpower it took Intel to come up with the absurd claim against Pete?

Why Intel would view Pete as a threat could be related to his vast programming knowledge. If Intel owns the benchmarks, you can sell anything unless someone blows your deception.

Steve



To: hmaly who wrote (84709)7/12/2002 9:54:41 AM
From: ElmerRespond to of 275872
 
What absurd claim. Read what Pete said.

I did, here it is: "200K wafers a week"

That's capacity, not utilization. That would be 40X Dresden. Do you really believe Intel has 40X the capacity of Dresden?

EP