Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (17238)	7/12/2002 10:06:12 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Is this your idea, or have you some other source for the allegation that Krugman made that up?

To: Bill who wrote (17238)	7/13/2002 1:58:56 AM
From: E	Respond to of 21057

Based on Krugman's now discredited piece, you said there is a letter saying Bush has not been exonerated. I simply asked a few questions: And where would this letter be? Have you seen it? If not, are you suggesting that is what was sent? Or did Krugman make it up? I'm asking, that's all. The Dallas Morning News quoted a 1993 letter from the SEC to Bush's lawyer emphasizing that its decision "must in no way be construed as indicating that (Bush) has been exonerated." That's not Krugman. Has anyone besides you said the SEC didn't say that? I asked before, but you didn't reply. Has the White House denied it? I haven't seen the letter with my own eyes, that's true. But if I were Bush, or his operators, I'd put it out there that it wasn't true, if that were the case. I'd feel more secure in the knowledge that no such letter was sent if somebody beside's SI Bill was... was... well, not "alleging" it wasn't, but "asking questions" about it like "Have you seen it?" and "Did Krugman make it up?" :^' )