SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (17263)7/12/2002 10:37:35 AM
From: Bill  Respond to of 21057
 
I didn't accuse Krugman of making it up and you know it. You started this off by stating there was a letter saying Bush hadn't been exonerated.

Message 17723765

I ASKED where the letter was.
I ASKED if there was no letter, DID Krugman make it up?

siliconinvestor.com

Now I ASK you to show me where I ACCUSED Krugman of making it up?

Where's the post?



To: E who wrote (17263)7/12/2002 10:38:08 AM
From: Constant Reader  Respond to of 21057
 
I don't think it is an unreasonable question. Why do you think so? If Krugman has the evidence he ought to produce it. If he is relying on second-hand information then he ought to say so. Making sensational charges and later retracting or qualifying them is nothing new.

I'm not interested in what others think - I want to see proof.



To: E who wrote (17263)7/12/2002 2:02:13 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
"This inquiry is confidential and should not be construed as an indication by the Commission or its staff that any violations have occurred; nor should it be construed as an adverse reflection on any person, entity or security."

public-i.org

What part of this don't you understand?
Why do you and that comedy writer insist Bush did something wrong when the SEC says the opposite?