SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SeachRE who wrote (274135)7/12/2002 1:37:42 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
well stupidity found, Mr Rexley posted a clear simple analysis and opinions. That's why I call you stupidity found and don't bother to ask if anyone is home LOL.
This was a very simple post by Mr Rexley.

proffer or opinion of belief expressed by JDN.
"I suspect, whether he admits it or not he realizes Clinton was NOT our most upstanding President"

Mr. Rexley gives, 1. a belief or agreement with JDN's proffer, 2. the implications or logical conclusion, 3. qualifications of the logical conclusion.

I suspect this also. If he does, then he is a liar. I did not say he was a liar, I said IF he believes the two
(Clinton and Bush) are on equal moral standing he is either a liar (see above) or an idiot.

Mr. Rexley 1. give his beliefs or analysis about the qualifications of the logical conclusion. Then 2.
Mr. Rexley expresses benefit of the doubt sentiment.
I doubt that he is an idiot, and until he answers (if he does) I don't know for sure if he is a liar.

The additional qualification opinion analysis of the logical conclusions 1. liar, 2. idiot. One suspects he is a liar.

But I suspect he is as there is no comparison if you look at the public information.

Mr. Rrexley quotes JDN's opinion on the stupidest that ever was.

"and I do think he (Clinton) hurt the country in the long haul"

Mr. Rexley asserts he agrees with JDN's opinion

I agree.

So stupidity found what part don't you under stand.????



To: SeachRE who wrote (274135)7/12/2002 2:37:11 PM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"I still have no idea what the heck you are talking about"

This does not surprise me. Follow the posts back. It should be fairly obvious.

Hint: Has to do with a comparison of Clinton's and Bush's morality. Who do you think has higher moral standards?

Can you understand that question, or do you need help?