SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (17301)7/12/2002 2:47:23 PM
From: Bill Grant  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21057
 
I don't agree with you. If someone had taken Bush to court, the SEC decision not to pursue the matter further would have been evidence in his favor. It is an exoneration. The alternative is to say that ALL parties investigated by the SEC are guilty by the mere fact of investigation, since the agency does not issue letters of exoneration.



To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (17301)7/12/2002 2:47:36 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
But isn't that a bit like saying the San Francisco Police have not exonerated you for the bank robbery there last week? C'mon.

They investigated the entire transaction and found no basis to conclude that Bush did anything illegal. That's called exoneration. Case closed.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News