Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TATRADER GIZZARD STUDY--Stocks 12.00 or Less..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Sawyer who wrote (31558)	7/12/2002 9:55:52 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Respond to of 59879

"About the only enhancement I can really think I'd like, would be something like Browsemaster's 100+ post fetching" Hmmm... That's an interesting idea. And there're some benefits to me that aren't immediately obvious to the casual reader. Since "Next10" is a subscriber-only feature, bumping up the number doesn't have any impact whatsoever on ad-viewing hits. And if people are viewing messages in larger batches, they're sending fewer page requests to the webserver, reducing the load on the CPU. Sure, it'd bump up the bandwidth utilization a little, but I've got a huge amount of that but only so much CPU horsepower. Hmmmm, indeed...

To: Mike Sawyer who wrote (31558)	7/12/2002 10:32:01 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 59879

FYI, viewing messages in batches of 10, 20, 50, or 100 is now a new feature. Took about an hour. Kinda unique when half the company is the guy in charge of all the geek stuff and he still likes to hang out on his alma mater. :) I've got an upgrade that would make me happy...Spell check that actually replaces the words you select. I'm such a dork sometimes...can't think of the proper spelling to save my life. LOL! Right after I put in the spell-check, I started trying to put something together that'd at least show each typo in a list and give the most likely correct word, but no luck. I tabled it after several fruitless hours and no luck finding a way to do it. I'm sure I'll revisit it later. Dictionary.com is able to do it, so it's at least possible. Unless their database includes every possible misspelling <sp?> of a word, there's got to be an acceptable way to do it and I'll figure it out eventually.