Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (52881)	7/13/2002 6:32:43 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Solon the decision may be well written it may be a reasonable interpretation of the constitution, but it is not unassailable. It is not the only possible result of rational consideration of the constitution. The decision is not even unassailable in terms of it being final settled law. It only covers on federal district, and it could be overturned. And even if it was settled law, it is quite possible to have contempt for a specific law or judicial decision without having contempt for the constitution or the rule of law in general. Tim