SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Palau who wrote (274562)7/13/2002 1:29:14 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
GORE CHOSE THE CONCERNS OF OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM OVER THE PUBLIC INTEREST

Gore Chose To Protect Occidentals Interest In Synthetic Fuels Despite The Warnings Of Environmentalists. Occidental Petroleum, along with the oil company Tenneco, controls "over 5,000 acres of prime oil shale land in western Colorados Piceance Basin, which contains the worlds largest known reserves of oil shale." (Ellen Haddow, "Occidental Delays Shale Oil Project," The Associated Press, December 21, 1981) Oil shale is a prime component in the production of synthetic fuels, which environmentalists, such as the Sierra Club, have decried as "environmentally extremely dangerous, economically unsupportable, [and]. . . greatly disrupt[ive] [of] our economy." (Sierra Club Website, "Oil Shale and Synthetic Fuels Policy," adopted July 21, 1979) On four key votes, the League of Conservation Voters determined that Gore sided with the interests of synthetic fuel supporters, such as Occidental, against the concerns of environmentalists:

Gore voted against an amendment that "would have prevented the federal government from promoting massive synthetic fuel development for commercial use." (CQ Vote #258: Rejected 69-351: R 45-108; D 24-243, June 26, 1979; "How Congress Voted on Energy and the Environment," League of Conservation Voters, 1979)

Gore voted to authorize $20 billion to encourage development of synthetic fuels. (CQ Vote #336: Adopted 317-93: R 85-65; D 232-28, June 26, 1980)

Gore voted to rescind $5 billion from the U.S. Synthetic Fuels Corporation to prevent the adoption of an amendment that would have rescinded $10 billion. (CQ Vote #308: Adopted 236-177: R 67-94; D 169-83, August 2, 1984)

Gore voted to table (kill) an amendment that would have rescinded all but $500,000,001 in unobligated funds from the U.S. Synthetic Fuels Corporation, excluding $500 million that would have been transferred to the Clean Coal Technology Reserve. (CQ Vote #270: Motion Rejected 41-58: R 22-31; D 19-27, October 31, 1985)

The Administration Chose To Protect Occidentals Interests In Sudan Instead Of National Security. Sudan is clearly a state that is an enemy of the United States. Not only has Sudan frequently been on the State Departments list of terrorist-supporting states, but the Administration also actively supports rebel groups attempting to overthrow its government. ("Oil Deals and Arms Sales," The New York Times, January 28, 1997) Despite this, within months of signing the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, the Administration granted Occidental a waiver to the prohibitions on financial transactions with rogue states that sponsor terrorism. (David B. Ottaway, "GOP Targets Sudan Loophole Administration Approval of Transactions with Khartoum Prompts Scrutiny," The Washington Post, February 7, 1997) This waiver allowed Occidental Petroleum to explore several potential oil deposits in Sudan. ("Oil Deals and Arms Sales," The New York Times, January 28, 1997)

Gore's Big Oil Contributions From PACs And Individuals, Including $4,000 From Occidental Chief Armand Hammer.

PAC Year Amount
Occidental Petroleum 1990- $550
Burlington Resources 1990- $250
Burlington Resources 1986- $500
Burlington Resources 1984- $750
USX Corporation PAC 1984- $500
PAC Total $2,550

Individual Profession:

Kreidler, David Michael
Occidental Oil and Gas Corp.
June 16, 2000 $1,000

Janssen, Judith M. Ms.
Exxon Mobile Corp./Attorney
June 7, 2000 $ 250

Hayden, Ludwick Mr. Jr.
Chevron
June 30, 1999 $1,000

Duck, William G.
Chevron Corp.
May 21, 1999 $1,000

Irani, Ray R.
Occidental Petroleum/CEO
April 6, 1999 $1,000

Irani, Ray R.
Occidental Petroleum/CEO
March 31, 1999 $1,000

McGee, Robert
Occidental Intl. Corp./Busin
March 31, 1999 $1,000

Laurance, Dale R.
Occidental Petroleum Corp./Pres.
March 31, 1999 $1,000

Chazen, Stephen
Occidental Petroleum Corp./Exec.
March 31, 1999 $1,000

Ahnell, Arden
BP Amoco/Manager
March 23, 1999 $1,000

Fagre, Nathan
Occidental Oil and Gas Corp.
March 17, 1999 $1,000

Hammer, Armand Dr.
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
Aug. 30, 1990 $1,000

Irani, Ray R.
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
Aug. 20, 1990 $ 500

Stern, Alfred
Occidental Petroleum
Aug. 20, 1990 $ 500

Total For Individuals $24,750

Date Amount:

Stern, Gerald M.
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
Aug. 20, 1990 $1,000

Hammer, Armand Dr.
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
June 26, 1989 $1,000

Wood, Robert L. Jr. Mr.
Occidental Oil and Gas Corp. J
uly 29, 1988 $1,000

Irani, Ray Dr.
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
July 19, 1988 $1,000

McSweeny, William F. Mr.
Occidental Intl. Corp.
Feb. 23, 1988 $ 500

Ajamian, Florence Ms.
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
June 18, 1987 $ 500

Hammer, Armand Dr.
Occidental Petroleum
June 18, 1987 $1,000

Hammer, Michael Armand
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
June 18, 1987 $1,000

Irani, Ray R. Mr.
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
June 18, 1987 $1,000

Jacobs, Richard Mr.
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
June 18, 1987 $1,000

Patrick, William N. Mr.
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
June 18, 1987 $1,000

Stern, Gerald M. Mr.
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
June 18, 1987 $1,000

Stern, Gerald
Occidental Petroleum.
April 24, 1984 $1,000

Tomich, Rosemary E.
Occidental Petroleum
Feb. 6, 1984 $ 500

Hammer, Armand
Occidental Petroleum
March 16, 1983 $1,000

Grand Total $27,300

liesaboutbush.com



To: Mr. Palau who wrote (274562)7/13/2002 1:31:08 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
You may not be, but I've seen you post hit piece innuendo articles about Bush, without ever doing the same thing during Clinton's reign.



To: Mr. Palau who wrote (274562)7/13/2002 1:32:43 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Mr Palau, do you truly realize how many articles I could post regarding Clinton's corruption? The amount of scandals, and abuse of power were phenomenal.



To: Mr. Palau who wrote (274562)7/13/2002 1:37:38 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Here's a good one. Imagine the outcry if President Bush had used the IRS to audit liberal organizations?

Clinton uses IRS Audits to Attack Critics

Liberation Journal (21/6/5000)
Bill Clinton has abused his power and has used the IRS as attack dogs against his enemies. Under his administration the IRS has conducted audits on numerous individuals and organizations who are critics of the Clinton administration and its agenda.
Joseph Farah, who's Western Journalism Center was one of the targets of the audits, wrote, "Just one day after his re-election as president, Clinton told his political supporters in Arkansas that he would devote a lot of time in his second term to going after detractors who pursued him on Whitewater and other ethical questions. He also called political attackers "a cancer" and vowed to "cut (them) out of American politics."" (2)
The 331-page "Communication Stream of Conspiracy Commerce" report, a political document produced and distributed at taxpayer expense, was compiled by the White House counsel's office in '96 and was in effect an "enemies list". Farah said, "It alleged that three tiny news agencies -- the Western Journalism Center, the conservative American Spectator and the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review -- served as the source of a "media food chain" on various and sundry Clinton scandals." (1)

Among those who have been audited was the Heritage Foundation who said that a person close to the Clinton administration made accusations against the Foundation that led to the IRS audit, the person who made the accusations was anonymous or the name was censored. What were the accusations? Unknown or undisclosed. What happened to the right to confront your accuser, to be told of the charges against you and to have the opportunity to defend yourself against them? Oh, yes, now I remember, Congress declared that the Constitution doesn't apply to the IRS. The Clinton administration displays not only personal arrogance that they can get away with anything but they are so arrogant as to blatantly abuse their power while trampling on fundamental constitutional protections.
The audit on the Heritage Foundation has cost them "more than $200,000 in attorneys fees so far" and has taken "at least 500 hours of heritage staff time" which could have been spent promoting their ideas and opposing the Clinton agenda. This is obviously a tactic of political warfare to tie up their enemies' resources so they are rendered less effective.

The Christian Coalition was not only audited but in an unprecedented move the IRS announced that the organization was being stripped of its tax-exempt status simply for providing information to the voters about candidates in their voter guides. This was completely outrageous and discriminatory. Many other non-profit organizations on the left, middle and right issue voter guides or otherwise provide information to voters on the issues and candidates, none of these organizations lost their tax-exempt status. The IRS had no right to do this, and federal judge agreed, and reversed the IRS decision and reinstated the tax exempt status of the Christian Coalition.

Western Journalism Center was targeted for an audit because of its articles critical of Bill Clinton and his administration. Joseph Farah who heads the Center said, "When the IRS field agent came knocking on our door, he was quite open about the motivations for the audit. "This is a political case, and the decision is going to be made at the national level," he told our accountant."

Other conservative organizations being audited include the National Rifle Association, Citizens against Government Waste, the American Spectator and the National Review.

Individuals who have been targeted for audits just happen to include women who have charged Clinton with sexual misconduct; Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who accused him of rape as well as Elizabeth Ward Gracen and Billy Dale.

Gregory Flanagan

libertocracy.com