Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (148187)	7/13/2002 5:18:31 PM
From: Joseph S. Lione	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572941

Ted - "I find it hard to believe that Jennings never mentioned a lawsuit against Clinton." Some news coverage was given to Judicial Watch lawsuits against Clinton. It's funny, because in them Judicial Watch was described as a "conservative" group, now however they are "respected", "non-partisan". Jennings is as partisan as they come, IMHO of course. Joe

To: tejek who wrote (148187)	7/13/2002 5:43:17 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572941

However, I find it hard to believe that Jennings never mentioned a lawsuit against Clinton. Its news and the business is very competitive. I find it highly unlikely that Jennings forwent the opportunity. You still don't get it. The entire point of the reference was that Jennings is NOT an unbiased newsman, he is a liberal with an agenda. Just like Dan Rather, Tom Brokow, and the entire staff of CNN and the Washington Post (save Woodward). Again, a liberal confronted with facts is in denial.