Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Full Disclosure Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (1187)	7/13/2002 8:15:42 PM
From: Return to Sender	Respond to of 13403

I think LMT is much more overextended than V but V is much more likely to end up going down as a questionable accounting scandal laden bankrupt company. V 6 month daily chart: stockcharts.com[h,a]daclyyay[pb50,200!d20,2][vc60][iUb14!Uk14!La12,26,9]&pref=G Lets assume the company manages to avoid additional bad press while the market rallies back a bit. If that happens then V could be a good short over 18. table.finance.yahoo.com table.finance.yahoo.com That being said LMT may travel back over 70 briefly but if we do not have a war with Iraq or something along those lines I am inclined to agree with Eugene in saying LMT is tremendously overextended and has got to fall when money rotates out of that sector: stockcharts.com[l,a]mhclyiay[d19950101,20020708][pb50!b200!d20,2!i!f][vc60][iUb14!Uk14!Ul14!Lp14,3,3!Lf!Lc20!Lah12,26,9]&pref=G So summing up; They are probably both good short candidates at the right price. While V could indeed go bankrupt, LMT will not, but it seems way too overextended on a historical basis. Short LMT at 70 and V at 18 maybe? RtS