SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (45578)7/14/2002 3:31:03 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
They mention the Juniper director being one of the biggest insider purchases. He paid twice as much as he had to and is still 20% underwater.
biz.yahoo.com

The only truly meaningful insider transaction that I ever saw was when John Chambers sold $150M worth of CSCO in Feb/Mar 2000. He may have missed the top of CSCO by $2 or $3 and likely nailed the top of the nazdaq comp.



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (45578)7/14/2002 5:24:41 PM
From: Duke-N-Duke  Respond to of 209892
 
Tripled from a base of nothing. That type of headline math reminds me of dot com scams highlighting quintupling eyeball counts from a base of 1.

$20.2 billion worth of sales versus $3.72 billion worth of purchases. So insiders are voting at a ratio of 5.4:1 that their own companies are SELLS.

When in Rome sell as the Romans sell.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News