SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Edscharp who wrote (78956)7/14/2002 7:38:21 PM
From: mmmary  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
and your point is, Ed?

that picking on little companies is wrong or something? I believe there are more losers and scam companies that are smaller. After years of not having any profits or real products to show for themselves, they just go under and never get big. I believe the big companies only start to get scammy juggling books when they start to slip and they don't want to miss their whisper numbers. A loser is a loser, big or small.



To: Edscharp who wrote (78956)7/14/2002 11:07:54 PM
From: heronwater  Respond to of 122087
 
Tony never 'took on' on the Enrons, Worldcoms and Mercks of the world.

He picked on little companies.


Ed, you have a point there. Tony never picked on the country club set. He went after the "small guys", who may have this characteristic.

1) Had no firms or analysts following them.
2) No real earnings!
3) No viable product to speak of.
4) Persistent PR releases, without any substance.
5) Personally had the time to post on 'message boards' or by phone, e-mail, their individual investors with 'updates'.
6) Had previous convictions.
7) Paid touts, hyping the stock?
8) OTC BB, a wink is as good as a nod, to a blind horse.

I will leave it to others to complete the top ten, since I had so many others to contribute and thought it too selfish ;0)

BTW, did anyone see 60 minutes tonight? geesh!!!