Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (17506)	7/15/2002 11:11:20 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

From a legal perspective, yes, he's in the clear. That has very little to do with what did or did not happen. As we all know, there's a world of difference between "innocent" and "not guilty". Just ask OJ. There are only two possibilities: either his timing was really, really, fortuitous or some inside information got whispered over lunch somewhere. If it makes you feel comfy to believe in the first scenario, feel free to believe it. I don't believe in that kind of coincidence where anybody else is involved, though, and I'm not going to start believing in it just because the individual involved is a Bush.