Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (17515)	7/15/2002 11:44:47 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

The evidence here is exculpatory.... The only exculpatory factor is the absence of a paper trail that only a total moron would leave. As I said before, I have a hard time believing in coincidence and luck as a factor fortuitously timed insider trades, no matter who is involved. I see no reason to become more credulous simply because the person involved is a prominent politician. Honstly, tell me: if you saw that kind of timing on an insider trade in a case with no political or ideological ramifications of any kind, wouldn't your default assumption be that something was rotten?