Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : World Affairs Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (431)	7/15/2002 12:42:48 PM
From: Scumbria	Respond to of 3959

Interesting article. Here is a in interesting viewpoint from a Muslim who has suffered first hand from Islamist insanity: news.bbc.co.uk Friday, 2 November, 2001, 16:23 GMT Rushdie attacks 'paranoid Islam' Novelist Salman Rushdie has entered the debate over the war in Afghanistan by saying world leaders are wrong to insist that terrorism and the fight against it were not about Islam. He pointed to worldwide Muslim demonstrations in support of Osama Bin Laden as evidence of a "jumbled, half-examined" version of Islam among some believers. The author of the controversial Satanic Verses argued Islam was being hijacked by political fanatics and needed to have its own process of reformation. If this isn't about Islam why the worldwide Muslim demonstrations in support of Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda? Salman Rushdie And the London-based writer said "paranoid Islam" was the quickest growing form of the religion and needed to be opposed in the Muslim world and the West. Mr Rushdie has spent years with the threat of death hanging over him following a "fatwa" by the now deceased Iranian leader Ayatollah Khomeni for his novel. The late revolutionary leader's 1989 religious decree declared Muslims had a duty to kill Mr Rushdie for his alleged blasphemy. Writing in the New York Times, Mr Rushdie said western leaders were guilty of repeating a "mantra" that "this war isn't about Islam". Self-incriminating statements "The trouble with this necessary disclaimer is that it isn't true," he wrote. "If this isn't about Islam why the worldwide Muslim demonstrations in support of Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda?" It would be absurd to deny that this self-exculpatory, paranoiac Islam is an ideology with widespread appeal Salman Rushdie Mr Rushdie said that for many "believing" Muslim men, Islam was a "jumbled, half-examined" cluster of customs and prejudices. Radical movements The writer maintained these included a loathing of modern society and a fear of the West's way of life taking over. "Highly-motivated organisations of Muslim men have been engaged over the last 30 years or so in growing radical political movements out of this mulch of belief," he said. "This paranoid Islam, which blames outsider, 'infidels', for all the ills of Muslim societies and whose proposed remedy is the closing of those societies to the rival project of modernity is presently the fastest growing version of Islam in the world. If terrorism is to be defeated, the world of Islam must take on board the secularist-humanist principles on which the modern is based Salman Rushdie "It would be absurd to deny that this self-exculpatory, paranoiac Islam is an ideology with widespread appeal." Mr Rushdie said many Muslims were beginning to question this version of Islam after 11 September and whether the Islamic world, not America and the West, is largely responsible for its own problems. But he said the movement was half-hearted and needed the active encouragement of West. Another Islam "I'm reminded of the way non-communist socialists used to distance themselves from the tyrannical socialism of the Soviets; nevertheless, the first stirrings of this counter-project are of great significance," he said. "If Islam is to be reconciled with modernity, these voices must be encouraged until they swell into a roar. "Many of them speak of another Islam, their personal, private faith. "If terrorism is to be defeated, the world of Islam must take on board the secularist-humanist principles on which the modern is based, and without which Muslim countries' freedom will remain a distant dream.