SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: reaper who wrote (179942)7/15/2002 4:10:42 PM
From: Oblomov  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
>> WHY are spreads widening

IMO, its just a consequence of what is happening with the economy. I think that the scenario you posited a few months ago (collapse in Treasury yields across the board) is coming true. MBS spreads were pricing in a recovery, which appears to have been based on false hope.

From what I hear, the market mechanism is working. There is no liquidity problem if 1998 is used as a benchmark.

I'm not convinced that MBS spreads and real estate prices are strictly linked. When spreads exploded in the late 70s/early 80s, real estate also performed well. But I can't see real estate performing well under current economic conditions. A debt deflation would pressure the price structure - that is, high-end houses would fall in price while the low-end and mid-priced houses would have some price stability. Bob Bronson at the Longwaves forum has posited a 5% drop in price per $100K peak value. That would be similar to a 1930s deflation in housing values, so it may be aggressive or conservative depending on your perspective.