SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (2190)7/15/2002 11:58:09 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Respond to of 89467
 
wealth effect is asymmetric, despite what press/media says

we all heard about the wealth effect in 1999 as stocks soared
mutual funds and 401ks grew, and so did our spending
consumer spending was believed to be tied to personal financial fortunes
and of course salary and other base incomes
now that is debated somewhat, somewhat dismissed
I think personal income is the most important factor

a Stanford professor researched the wealth effect 30 yrs ago
he found the "loss aversion" to be much much more powerful
spending was sharply reduced as savings were depleted
spending was not materially affected when "house gains" were lost
but when base capital is lost, spending was reduced noticeably

he called his result "the asymmetric wealth effect"
right now, just today I heard Haines on CNBC talk of the falsity of the wealth effect
(now that it has become relevant again)
he claimed it was not a strong factor on the way up, and probably is not gonna be a strong factor on the way down
(his theory was pure hope, utter bullshit)

beware, consumer spending will soon be reduced
the most conservative of people are seeing their savings and pension funds reduced

tonight I spoke with another college roommate by phone
we discussed our common Ohio buddy who was fired Friday
he mentioned that his 401k is down 30% since January
he is upset but undeterred
he will ride out the coming storm over the next few years
"it always comes back"
smart guy, very typical, losses assured imho

beware the asymmetric wealth effect
I remember in spring 2000, I stopped almost all all all discretionary spending
I spent like a miser
rent, food, movies, and not much else
hardly any entertainment, an occasional movie
I even "snuck in" to see a couple movies !!!
waited outside the exit door in the evening crowds, entered

this wealth effect will be the latest in press/media bullshit
their reporting is based upon hope, not historical data
the Stanford professor research was done in realistic settings under controlled environment
/ jim