Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (275759)	7/15/2002 9:33:47 PM
From: Poet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I have opinions about a lot of things, including being baited. :-) Have a good evening.

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (275759)	7/15/2002 9:47:34 PM
From: JBTFD	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 769670

"The Patriot Act already provides for a person's home to be searched without that person being informed that a search was ever performed, or of any surveillance devices that were implanted. " I did not know this.

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (275759)	7/15/2002 10:07:28 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

<<Hey, Poet: "US Planning to Recruit One in 24 Americans as Citizen Spies" You have an opinion of your own about this one?>> I have an opinion. I'll volunteer. Ray Duray will be my first find. He thinks the WTC killers are martyrs.

To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (275759)	7/16/2002 12:21:26 AM
From: Doug R	Respond to of 769670

They weave a tangled web By STEPHEN WINN The Kansas City Star Vice President Dick Cheney has been asking Americans to be on the lookout for "things that are out of the ordinary or unusual." Well, Mr. Vice President, now that you mention it, something odd did happen recently: You and other high-ranking administration officials began frantically clanging the terrorism alarm bells without offering any real evidence of an increased risk. A lot of things, of course, might happen. But the administration's high-profile worriers have not explained why their warnings suddenly became so shrill. In most cases they are merely speculating; someone, somewhere, someday might blow up an apartment building, for example. Meanwhile, the government's official alert level on terrorism remained unchanged. That oversight gave the game away. The recent Chicken Little routine was actually designed to distract the public from the developing scandal over the administration's failure to better protect the country against terrorism. A great deal of information is now gushing forth about the administration's mistakes. But there are three basic categories: Sloth and ineptitude before the Sept. 11 attacks. Recent news stories have revealed many warnings inside the government last year -- some more specific than others -- about the approaching danger of al-Qaida attacks. Last summer the FBI knew enough to warn law enforcement agencies of possible domestic attacks by al-Qaida. Individual FBI agents raised alarming questions about students from Middle Eastern countries taking flying lessons. By early July, President Bush was concerned enough to ask Condoleezza Rice, his national security adviser, what government agencies were doing with intelligence reports about al-Qaida threats. A month later the CIA, in a report to the president, raised the possibility of al-Qaida hijackings. The government took some preventive measures but obviously not enough. In many places, there appears to have been little sense of urgency. When Sen. Dianne Feinstein, alarmed by what she was hearing about near-term terrorist threats, asked to meet with Cheney on the subject, the California Democrat was told that his staff would need six months to prepare for such a meeting. That was on Sept. 10, one day before the attacks. Bush and Cheney take offense at suggestions that they be held personally responsible for the government's failure to respond more vigorously to last year's warnings. If the blame rests with other high-level people, however, where are their resignations? Unless the top officials who made the mistakes leave the administration, how can the public know they won't be repeated? Or are we to suppose that only anonymous low-level bureaucrats were responsible for the government's fateful inertia? Deception of the public after Sept. 11. The administration's story line last fall and winter was that the terrorist attacks came without warning. As we now know, this was nonsense. "America never dreamt before September the 11th anybody would attack us," Bush said on Dec. 21. And just a couple weeks ago, Rice told the country: "I don't think anybody could have predicted these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center." Terrorism experts, in fact, had long speculated about precisely this possibility. And an FBI agent in Minnesota raised it in a memo last September. The administration's deceptions since last September have undermined its credibility at a critical time. Bush and his aides have repeatedly asked for the public's trust in recent months. Yet they have sorely abused that trust. Continued incompetence and inaction. While the administration has effectively carried the battle to the enemy in Afghanistan, it has failed to fix many of the domestic security problems that have been revealed since Sept. 11. Bush has failed to give Tom Ridge, his much-ballyhooed homeland security czar, the authority he needs over jealous rivals. Many security improvements need to be made. Finally, the administration continues to hinder the congressional investigation of the Sept. 11 disaster and, even worse, to oppose an independent investigation. Bush and his top aides have made plenty of mistakes already. They should at least drop their resistance to the inevitable and accept an independent investigation. kansascity.com