SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (180174)7/15/2002 11:45:45 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
I thought Tauzin was a Republican. There's not enough of a strong majority that one party can dictate to the other. Also, many of these bills had a very strong majority of votes from both parties. Dems in Northeast and California strongly supported the pro-IPO, pro-tech bills. You don't hear Hillary complaining anymore about the tax breaks drug firms in her state get for locating factories in Puerto Rico.



To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (180174)7/15/2002 11:48:22 PM
From: Roads End  Respond to of 436258
 
True, pointing the finger at the options issue is only a political smoke screen. The bubble would have been there with or with out options.



To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (180174)7/16/2002 9:32:29 AM
From: Mike M2  Respond to of 436258
 
Patron, what is really happening is divide and conquer. Both parties sold out the average American to perpetuate the bubble so that the retirement savings of honest working American could be looted by Wall St and the corporate elite. When things get bad enough I hope to see a viable third party but the public has to be reamed some more before they figure out thay both parties are for sale at the expense of the public. mike