Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (17576)	7/16/2002 7:49:37 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Of course not. It's perfectly ok for a company insider to trade on the basis of privileged information, as long as the insider leaves no documentary evidence of having received the information and the stock doesn't do what the insider thought it was going to do at the time the trade was made. I didn't say there was a case to be made or that the incident had resulted in harm or foul. Only that it provides some indication of the man's character, and raises some questions about his commitment to corporate ethics.