Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (17596)	7/16/2002 3:00:18 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Interesting how little you take away from articles and from people's posts. Actually, for a long time I was making efforts to answer items point by point. I was often posting quite substantive posts, sometimes lengthy and time-consuming ones. I was getting in reply, as a matter of routine, one-liners or single-item selective responses. (I even got recently an amusing reply containing the opinion that if a reply was longer than the original assertion, it meant one had an "agenda.") I've caught on, Bill. (Also I've gotten awfully busy, I admit.) And also: What I take away is different from what I discuss with you. There's a category I've learned exists titled "It's hopeless." I just let it go. If Bush has misdeeds that affect his suitability and credibility in regard to overseeing certain reforms, they those should be brought forth and judged. At worst, he will retain more dignity than Clinton, and more of a good name.