SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maui_dude who wrote (168371)7/16/2002 6:37:22 PM
From: L. Adam Latham  Respond to of 186894
 
maui:

Thanks for the historical info on revenues for H1 vs. H2. Q4 '01 revenues were $7.0B, down 20% from the year before. That's why I wasn't to sure about estimating Q4 '02 revenues very high.

As you mentioned, using the 45%/55% rule may estimate Q4 too high at $9.4B. What do you think is a better estimate?

Adam



To: maui_dude who wrote (168371)7/16/2002 6:40:03 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
All, just listened to Barrett's talk. Didn't take any notes, but in short, it was an overall call-to-arms. The reduction in headcount by 4,000 will be accomplished much in the same way as before (severance package, attrition), though he left open the possibility that some groups might get cut outright.

Barrett did spend some time talking about the corporate scandals that have been hitting the daily headlines. He reiterated that Intel does not do this and will not do it.

Overall, I didn't hear anything surprising or shocking to me.

Tenchusatsu

P.S. - One interesting thing was that Barrett mentioned AMD by name a few times in his speech, especially in regard to the processor speed race. He mentioned that whether you use clock speed or some other objective performance measurement, Intel has the performance lead across the board. He also hinted that AMD's two warnings in the prior quarter was a result of Intel's good execution.