Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (276510)	7/16/2002 8:37:29 PM
From: Emile Vidrine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769668

So why did you deceive and lie about Israel invading first? Do you subscribe to the Zionist ethics that three wrongs make a right? Since England and France were equally responsible for the invasion (not to speak of the dual loyalty Zionist Jews in the English and French government that made it possible), does that change Israel from an aggressors to a victim? Israel was the primary beneficiary of the invasion. In addition, Israel repeated their invasion in 67! Did you read Dayan;s admition that Israel deliberately invaded the Golan Heights to steal rich agricultural land? Why does the Zionist controlled US press always misrepresent this Israeli invasion as a defensive action? Have you heard the term Zionist conspiracy? Why is it more acceptable to believe in an Arab/Moslem conspiracy than to believe in a conspicuous Zionist conspiracy?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (276510)	7/16/2002 10:03:17 PM
From: Dr. Doktor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769668

<Sure. As long as you are willing to include the British and French in your condemnation. They also participated in the '67 war. And they both engaged in plenty of imperialism. Remember the British Empire? "The sun never sets"? The French had an empire too. > Not to mention the imperialism of the Christians throughout history. There has been no other religion responsible for as much death and destruction as Christianity. But to Emile thats OK cause it was all in the name of Christ. DOC