SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (1574)7/17/2002 3:04:46 PM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25522
 
Al, the briefing.com note made it sound like new news and no doubt affected the stock. Brian is right: it's better to keep the officials honest. Brian is not upset about the statement but about the way he found it.

Gottfried



To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (1574)7/17/2002 3:22:09 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25522
 
G is absolutely correct in saying that Brian is not upset about the statement but about the way he found it.

This is a matter of fair play plain and simple. Everyone should have equal access to information which may move the price of a stock. This is the law. Am I upset when the appearance of a company breaking this law occurs? You bet I am and rightfully so.

Brian


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News