SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (34555)7/18/2002 3:19:35 AM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
An Affhan army is slowly being built, but in any case of the Taliban to retake Afghanistan they would have to defeat a number of the "regional governors", and I don't think 5,000 is enough to do that.

In all fairness, the Taliban wouldn't need to "defeat" the regional governors. They could capture the provinces in much the same way they did the first time round: BUY the regional governors. We are talking about Afghanistan, World Capital of Turncoats here...

The question is, how can the United States and its allies in the Afghan provisional government maintain favor amongst the key players, and the populace at large? From what I've been reading, we're starting to piss people off...

Derek



To: TimF who wrote (34555)7/18/2002 4:06:52 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
A core of 5000, especially deployed initially in a guerilla configuration would be enough to make serious trouble, especially if the regional governors are too busy facing off with each other to effectively oppose. It would not be necessary for them to mass into groups that would be easy air targets. They wouldn't have to mount a conventional assault to put a lot of stress on the Afghan military and the limited foreign contingent there.