SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sandintoes who wrote (277218)7/17/2002 10:43:49 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
'Shaddap yer silly yap,' as yer buddy JLA would say, sandinbrain.

LOL.

Do you ever think about anything that's ... like, important?

Such as this latest on 'Oil Slick Dick'

He's profiteering. sandibrain -- via Halliburton on wars he's creating as the
President of Vice:

sfbg.com

Get your head out of the tabloids at the grocery store checkout line, would be one suggestion I'd offer to you.

bia



To: sandintoes who wrote (277218)7/17/2002 10:46:14 PM
From: rich4eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
You are so biased and narrow minded. Please explain why Democrats are bad, Ms genius?



To: sandintoes who wrote (277218)7/17/2002 10:53:03 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin  Respond to of 769667
 
Dick Cheenie's Halliburton: profiteers on phony wars

PART ONE:

Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP)
Timeline

CorpWatch
May 2, 2002

Texas-based multinational Halliburton (parent company of Brown &
Root) have made millions out of the U.S. wars in the last decade
by providing support services to the military. For more on Brown &
Root, read Pratap Chatterjee's article, The War on Terrorism's
Gravy Train.

Somalia: "Operation Restore Hope" December 1992 --
$62.0 million contract Base camp construction and
maintenance; food service and supply; laundry; field
showers; latrines; water production, storage, and
distribution; sewage/solid waste removal; bulk fuel receipt,
storage, and issue; transportation for passengers and
cargo; and linguist support.

Rwanda: "Operation Support Hope" August 1994 -- $6.3
million. Water production, storage, and distribution.

Haiti: "Operation Uphold Democracy" September 1994 --
$133.0 million. Base camp construction and maintenance;
food service and supply; laundry; bulk fuel receipt, storage,
and issue; airport and seaport operations; and
transportation services.

Saudi Arabia/Kuwait: "Operation Vigilant Warrior"
October 1994 -- $5.1 million. Food service and supply;
transportation; Arabia/convoy support; shuttle bus service;
Kuwait laundry; and off loading and storing containers from
ships.

Italy: "Operation Deny Flight" September 1995 -- $6.3
million. Base camp construction.

Bosnia: "Operation Joint Endeavor" December 1995 -- $2.2
billion. Base camp construction and maintenance; showers;
latrines; food service and supply; sewage/solid waste
removal; water production, storage, and distribution; shuttle
bus service; bulk fuel receipt, storage, and issue; heavy
equipment transportation; mail delivery; construction
material storage and distribution; railhead operations; and
seaport operations.

Central Asia: "Operation Enduring Freedom" October 2001
-- Budget Unknown. Planning, base camp maintenance,
facilities maintenance, laundry services, food services,
airfield services, property accountability and supply
operations.

Source: GAO, U.S. Army

corpwatch.org

......PART TWO FOLLOWS ...

bia



To: sandintoes who wrote (277218)7/17/2002 11:02:35 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
The War on Terrorism's Gravy Train

Cheney's Former Company Wins
Afghanistan War Contracts

By Pratap Chatterjee
Special to CorpWatch
May 2, 2002

Queenstown,
Vogaria, West Africa
-- On July 16, 2000,
United States Army
scrambled to deploy
troops at the request
of the embattled
Vogarian government
in a top secret
mission code named
Operation Restore
Order.

Political and
economic instability,
factional fighting
outside the capital of
Queenstown created
large numbers of
displaced civilians.
Large-scale famine
and disease were
feared. In five days
the U.S. Army
teamed up with a private company in Texas
to deploy and assemble a military camp
out of a pre-fabricated kit known as Force
Provider to assist the Vogarians.

Vogaria, of course, is a fictional country but
the military exercise -- which took place at
Fort McPherson, Georgia and the Diamond
Reserve Center in Louisiana -- could not be
more real. The Logistics Civil Augmentation
Program's War Fighter Exercise 2000 was
the first ever Department of Defense
simulation of civilian contractors assisting
the army in rapid response assembly of
military bases in a war situation.

The U.S. military has always relied on
private contractors to provide some basic
services such as construction, dating back
as far as the Civil War. But today as much
as 10% of the emergency U.S. army
operations overseas are contracted out to
private companies run by former
government and military officials. These
private companies operate with no public
oversight despite the fact that these
contractors work just behind the battle
lines. The companies are allowed to make
up to nine percent in profit out of these war
support efforts. And experience so far has
shown that the companies are not above
skimming more profits off the top if they
can.

Kellogg, Brown & Root Joins the
War on Terrorism

Employees of Kellogg, Brown & Root, a
subsidiary of Vice President Dick Cheney's
former company, Halliburton Corporation of
Dallas, Texas, are set to arrive at the
Bagram airbase in southern Afghanistan in
late April or early May 2002 (the exact date
is classified) to take over the support
services a Force Provider camp. They are
also scheduled to arrive at the Khanabad
airbase in Uzbekistan, one of the main
military support stations for the war in
Afghanistan, to run three Air Force Harvest
Eagle camps (an earlier version of Force
Provider) for the 1,500 U.S troops based
there since October, according to Daniel
McGinty, a spokesman at the Defense
Contract Management Agency.

Kellogg, Brown & Root will take charge of
support services including base camp
maintenance, laundry services, food
services, airfield services, and supply
operations, among others. Gale L. Smith, a
spokesperson for the U.S. Army
Operations Support Command in
Alexandria, Virginia refuses to confirm or
deny whether Kellogg, Brown & Root would
be working on similar bases in Manas,
Kyrgyzstan or other sites in Afghanistan
and Pakistan to support Operation
Enduring Freedom. The new job is one of
the first examples of a lucrative, new
ten-year contract that Kellogg, Brown &
Root won from the Pentagon on December
14, 2001 titled Logistics Civil Augmentation
Program (LOGCAP). The contract is what
the Pentagon calls a "cost-plus-award-fee,
indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity
service," which basically means that the
federal government has an open-ended
mandate and budget to send Kellogg,
Brown & Root anywhere in the world to run
humanitarian or military operations for
profit.

The Revolving Door

Halliburton, Kellogg, Brown & Root's parent
company, is a Fortune 500 construction
corporation working primarily for the oil
industry. In the early 1990s the company
was awarded the job to study and then
implement privatization of routine army
functions under Dick Cheney, then
secretary of defense.

When Cheney quit his job at the Pentagon,
he landed the job as chief executive of
Halliburton, bringing with him, his trusted
deputy David Gribbin. The two substantially
increased Halliburton's government
business until they quit in 2000 when
Cheney was elected vice-president, taking
multi-million dollar golden parachutes with
them. Since then, another former military
office and Cheney confidante, Admiral Joe
Lopez, former commander in chief for U.S.
forces in southern Europe, took over
Gribbin's former job of go-between the
government and the company, according to
Kellogg, Brown & Root's own press
releases. Other close friends include
Richard Armitage, the assistant secretary
of state, who worked as a consultant to
Halliburton before taking up his present job.

Critics charge that this is a classic
example of the revolving door between
government and big business. Bill Hartung,
senior research fellow at the World Policy
Institute in New York, says: "Cheney gives
new meaning to the term revolving door. If
he does not get elected president next, I
have no doubt he will return to Halliburton
when he leaves the White House."

And Harvey Wasserman, author of The
Last Energy War, says the Kellogg, Brown
& Root contracts are a scandal. "The
Bush-Cheney team have turned the United
States into a family business. That's why
we haven't seen Cheney -- he's cutting
deals with his old buddies who gave him a
multi-million dollar golden handshake,"
says Wasserman. "Have they no grace, no
shame, no common sense? Why don't just
have Enron run America? Or have Zapata
Petroleum (George W. Bush's failed oil
exploration venture) build a pipeline across
Afghanistan?"

Jennifer Millerwise, a spokesperson for
Cheney's office, denies that there was any
contact help from the White House. "The
vice president did not discuss this with
anybody from Halliburton or any subsidiary
of Halliburton. Nor does he comment on
Halliburton's policies since he doesn't work
there any more," she said.

The Business of War

Last year Kellogg, Brown & Root took in
$13 billion in revenues, according to its
latest annual report. Currently Kellogg,
Brown & Root estimates it has $740 million
in existing United States government
contracts, approximately 37% of their
global business, most of which are in
addition to the LOGCAP deal.

For example, in mid-November 2001
Kellogg, Brown & Root was paid $2 million
to reinforce the United States embassy in
Tashkent, Uzbekistan, under contract with
the State department. More recently
Kellogg, Brown & Root was paid $16 million
to go to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in March
2002 to build a 408-person prison for
captured Taliban fighters under a contract
with the U.S. Navy, according to Pentagon
press releases.

That's by no means all -- Kellogg, Brown &
Root employees can be found back home
running support operations for the U.S.
Army in Fort Knox, Kentucky to the U.S.
Naval Base in El Centro, California.

And it is snapping up contracts with
American allies also -- in September 2001,
the company signed on to a $283 million
project for Russia's Defense Threat
Reduction Agency to eliminate liquid-fueled
ICBMs missiles and their silos. In
November 2001 Kellogg, Brown & Root won
a $100 million order from the Philippines to
convert the former ship repair facilities of
the U.S. Navy in Subic Bay into a modern
commercial port facility and in December it
won a $420 million contract from the British
Army to support a fleet of new mammoth
tank transporters, according to company
press releases.

Kellogg, Brown & Root is no stranger to the
business of war. From 1962 to 1972 the
Pentagon paid the company tens of
millions of dollars to go to South Vietnam,
where they built roads, landing strips,
harbors, and military bases from the
demilitarized zone to the Mekong delta.
The company was one of the main
contractors hired to construct the Diego
Garcia airbase in the Indian Ocean,
according to Pentagon military histories.

Running services at military camps is a
relatively new chore for Kellogg, Brown &
Root that began in 1992 when the
Pentagon, then under Cheney's direction,
paid the company $3.9 million to produce a
classified report detailing how private
companies (like itself) could help provide
logistics for American troops in potential
war zones around the world. (see related
article) Later in 1992, the Pentagon gave
the company an additional $5 million to
update its report.

That same year, Kellogg, Brown & Root
won its first five-year logistical support
contract from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers that would send them into work
alongside G.I.s in places like Somalia,
Haiti, Kosovo, Bosnia, and Saudi Arabia.
The Balkan contract has been the most
profitable for Kellogg, Brown & Root -- the
General Accounting Office (GAO)
estimates that the company made $2.2
billion in revenue during the U.S. military
operations there building sewage systems,
kitchens, and showers and even washing
underwear for the 20,000 U.S. soldiers
stationed there.

Kudos from the Army, Criticism
from Outside

Army staff and their supporters have
nothing but praise for Kellogg, Brown &
Root. The Logistics Management Institute,
a military think-tank, claims that LOGCAP
contractors employed 24 percent fewer
personnel and were 28 percent less
expensive.

But other government agencies are more
skeptical. "It is convenient to contract a lot
of this work out. The problem is that the
government doesn't do the best job of
oversight," says Neil Curtin, director of
operations and readiness issues at the
defense capabilities and management team
at the GAO.

Policy analysts say that it is simply a
matter of time before something goes
wrong. "Suppose a local Afghani contractor
gets kidnapped or used for mischief? This
has not been thought through at the policy
level or opened up for public debate," notes
Thomas Donnelly, deputy executive director
of the Project for the New American
Century in Washington DC.

In fact some of the cost cutting is managed
by hiring local workers at lower wages than
U.S. soldiers would be paid, a controversial
practice that has its drawbacks. In 1994
United Nations troops armed with batons
and tear gas had to be brought in to quell
protests by workers that Kellogg, Brown &
Root dismissed at the end of its
engagement in Somalia. In Saudi Arabia,
the army was alarmed when it discovered
that locally contracted drivers were firing up
portable propane tanks to cook meals out
in the desert while transporting high
explosive ordinance weapons, according to
a student report published by the Air
University at Maxwell Air Force base in
Alabama.

Independent agencies are still skeptical.
For example a February 1997 study by the
GAO showed that an operation that was
estimated at $191.6 million when presented
to Congress in 1996 had ballooned to $461
and a half million a year later. Examples of
overspending included flying in plywood
from the United States at a cost of $85.98
per sheet (the cost in the United states
was $14.06) and billing the Army to pay its
employees income taxes in Hungary.

A subsequent GAO report, issued in
September 2000, noted that army
commanders in the Balkans were unable to
keep track of contracts as they were
typically rotated out after six months,
erasing institutional memory. For example
the GAO pointed out that many of the
Kellogg, Brown & Root contract employees
were idle most of the time despite the fact
that offices were being cleaned four times a
day. The GAO also faulted Kellogg, Brown
& Root in its over-zealous purchase of
power generators at great expense and
employing far more firefighters than
necessary.

Allegations of Fraud

In February this year Kellogg, Brown &
Root paid out $2 million to settle a lawsuit
with the Justice Department, which alleged
that the company defrauded the
government during the closure of the Fort
Ord military base in Monterey, California in
the mid-1990s.

The allegations in the case first surfaced
several years ago when Dammen Gant
Campbell, a former contracts manager for
Kellogg, Brown & Root, turned
whistle-blower and charged that between
1994 and 1998 the company fraudulently
inflated project costs by misrepresenting
the quantities, quality and types of
materials required for 224 projects.
Campbell said that the company submitted
a detailed "contractors pricing proposal"
from an Army manual containing fixed
prices for some 30,000 line items.

Once the proposal was approved, the
company submitted a more general
"statement of work" which did not contain a
detailed breakdown of items to be
purchased. Then, according to Campbell,
Kellogg, Brown & Root intentionally did not
deliver many items listed in the original
proposal. The company defends this
practice by claiming that the "statement of
work" was the legally binding document,
not the original "contractors pricing
proposal."

"Whether you characterize it as fraud or
sharp business practices, the bottom line
is the same, the government was not
getting what it paid for, " explained Michael
Hirst, who litigated the case for United
States Attorney's office in Sacramento.
"We alleged that they exploited the
contracting process and increased their
profits at the government's expense," Hirst
added.

Meanwhile, Campbell's attorney, Dan
Schrader, was pleased with the settlement
but he wondered why the company was so
eager to compromise. "If the company was
indicted, I suspect that it might have been
far more difficult for them to get new
government contracts," he said.

Indeed the recently issued 2001 annual
report says precisely that, in its notes on
the settlement of the lawsuit: "Kellogg,
Brown & Root's ability to perform further
work for the U.S. government has not been
impaired." Adds Hirst: "Kellogg, Brown &
Root was very cooperative and eager to
settle. They said they wanted to maintain a
good relationship with the government."

Kellogg, Brown & Root will have a harder
time milking the contract in Afghanistan
because the government is now dispatching
auditors from the Defense Contract
Management Agency to monitor all
purchases but it still stands to make at
least a profit on whatever it can bill. The
contract allows for the company to charge
up to a 9% mark up on supplies.

And if the "war on terrorism" expands to the
size of the Balkan operations that could
add up to a few hundred million dollars in
profits. In addition to the bases in
Uzbekistan and Afghanistan, the Army
recently started dispatching Force Provider
units to the Manas airbase in Kyrgzstan,
as recently as January 2002, to support up
to 3,500 soldiers. Whether or not Kellogg,
Brown & Root will follow them there, the
Army has yet to tell the public.

At the time of writing Kellogg, Brown &
Root kept its mouth shut about potential
work in Afghanistan or Uzbekistan.
"Kellogg, Brown & Root has not deployed
nor been tasked to provide support in either
country," said Zelma Branch, a
spokesperson for the company, refusing to
give any more details about the current
LOGCAP contract. When provided with
evidence that the company was indeed
going to both countries, she emailed this
response: "We can not elaborate at this
time. Recommend you contact the Army."

The Pentagon, on the other hand, is
considering considerably expanding the
role of the private sector to do a variety of
services from refueling fighter jets and
bombers in mid-air to running the missile
tracking systems.

Rumors are swirling that the Defense
Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) is
considering hiring private contractors to
train the new Afghan police and army,
which it has done in the past in places like
Croatia where it hired a private company to
train the military.

David Des Roches, a DSCA spokesman,
denied that the Pentagon had a proposal on
the table at the moment but did not rule out
the future possibility. "A lot of people have
said, 'Ding ding ding, gravy train'. But in
point of fact, it makes sense. They're
probably better at doing these sorts of
missions than anyone else I could think of,"
he said.

Bill Hartung of the World Policy Institute
disagrees. "This is a company which has
more experience with insider dealing and
corruption than with efficiency, " he
explained. "During the Second World War,
there was a Senate committee on war
profiteering. Personally I think we should
set it up again and investigate Kellogg,
Brown & Root."

Pratap Chatterjee is a freelance journalist
based in Berkeley, California. In 1994-1995
he reported on the World Bank and the
International Monetary Fund for Inter Press
Service, a Third World News Service, in
Washington D.C.

The War on Terrorism's Gravy
Train

By Pratap Chatterjee

Star Wars

By Karl Grossman

Homeland Security,
Homeland Profits

From Issue: Internet Politics

Toxic Drift: Monsanto and the
Drug War in Colombia

By Jeremy Bigwood

>> More Articles

Updated: 07/02/2002

USA: Northrop to Purchase
TRW for $7.8 Billion

South America: Countries
Worry Plan Colombia Will
Spillover

Philippines: Preparations for
U.S. Military Base Sparks
Alarm

USA: Bush Faces Flak Over
Links to Defense Contractor

USA: Boeing's Sweet Deal

>> More News

Updated: 06/27/2002

Companies Break Law, Still
Win Big Government
Contracts
CorpWatch
PO Box 29344
San Francisco, CA 94129 USA
Tel: 415-561-6568 Fax: 415-561-6493
URL: corpwatch.org
Email: corpwatch@corpwatch.org

____________________________

bia



To: sandintoes who wrote (277218)7/17/2002 11:50:35 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
LOL! While looking for 'Rummy's' corporation ...

...which I should know as a good friend who's done spectacularly well with DELL employee stock options since 1995, had a superior up the line who left this company (big defense contractor/conglom, as I recall) to join DELL during the mid-hey-day run-up (like, '97 or '98 or so) ... ANYBODY? What the hell is it?

More on 'Rummy,' ... GOODNESS GRACIOUS!! -g-

Published on Wednesday, January 3, 2001 in The Consortium News
Rev. Moon, the Bushes & Donald
Rumsfeld
by Robert Parry

George W. Bush’s choice of Donald Rumsfeld to be U.S. defense secretary could
put an unintended spotlight on the role of the Rev. Sun Myung Moon – a Bush
family benefactor – in funneling millions of dollars to communist North Korea in the
1990s as it was developing a missile and nuclear weapons program.

In 1998, Rumsfeld headed a special commission, appointed by the
Republican-controlled Congress, that warned that North Korea had made substantial
progress during the decade in building missiles that could pose a potential nuclear
threat to Japan and parts of the United States.

"The extraordinary level of resources North Korea and Iran are now devoting to
developing their own ballistic missile capabilities poses a substantial and immediate
danger to the U.S., its vital interests and its allies," said the report by Rumsfeld's
Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States.

"North Korea maintains an active WMD [weapons of mass destruction] program,
including a nuclear weapon program. It is known that North Korea diverted material
in the late 1980s for at least one or possibly two weapons," the report said.

Rumsfeld’s alarming assessment of North Korea’s war-making capabilities now is
being cited by Republicans as a justification for investing billions of taxpayer dollars
in an anti-missile defense system favored by Bush and Rumsfeld.

Yet, during the early-to-mid 1990s, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency was
monitoring a series of clandestine payments from Sun Myung Moon's organization
to the North Korean communist leaders who were overseeing the country's military
strategies.

According to DIA documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act,
Moon’s payments to North Korean leaders included a $3 million “birthday present”
to current communist leader Kim Jong Il and offshore payments amounting to
“several tens of million dollars” to the previous communist dictator, Kim Il Sung.

The alleged payments – and broader Moon-North Korean business deals reported
by the DIA – came at a time of a strict U.S. government ban on financial
transactions between North Korea and any U.S. person or entity, to keep hard
currency out of North Korea's hands.

Legal experts say that ban would have applied to Moon given his status as a
permanent U.S. resident, even though he maintains South Korean citizenship.

Bush Speeches

While negotiating those business deals with North Korea in the 1990s, Moon’s
organization also hired former President George H.W. Bush and former First Lady
Barbara Bush to give speeches at Moon-sponsored events.

During one Moon-sponsored speech in Argentina in November 1996, former
President Bush declared, “I want to salute Reverend Moon,” whom Bush praised as
“the man with the vision.”

The father of the incoming U.S. president has refused to divulge how much Moon’s
organization paid for these speeches which were delivered in the United States,
Asia and South America.

Some press estimates have put the fees in the hundreds of thousands of dollars,
though one former leader of Moon’s Unification Church told me that the organization
had earmarked $10 million for the former president.

Ex-President Bush’s pro-Moon speeches came at a time, too, when Moon – now 80
– was expressing intensely anti-American views. In the mid-1990s, Moon
denounced the United States as “Satan’s harvest” and condemned American
women as having descended from a “line of prostitutes.”

In a speech to his followers on Aug. 4, 1996, Moon vowed to liquidate American
individuality, declaring that his movement would “swallow entire America.” Moon
said Americans who insisted on “their privacy and extreme individualism … will be
digested.”

Beyond these anti-Americanism diatribes, other questions have arisen about how
Moon finances his religious-business-political empire. Evidence has existed back to
the 1970s indicating that Moon’s organization has engaged in money-laundering
operations and has associated with right-wing organized-crime figures in Asia and
Latin America.

One of Moon's key early backers was Ryoichi Sasakawa, a leader of Japan's
Yakuza organized crime family, according to the authoritative book, Yakuza, by
David E. Kaplan & Alec Dubro.

In 1998, Moon’s ex-daughter-in-law, Nansook Hong, added first-hand testimony
about one of Moon's money-laundering methods when she described how cash was
smuggled illegally through U.S. Customs. Moon “demonstrated contempt for U.S.
law every time he accepted a paper bag full of untraceable, undeclared cash” carried
into the United States from overseas, she wrote in her book, In the Shadows of the
Moons.

Checkered Past

To many Americans, Moon is perhaps best known as a 1970s cult leader who
allegedly brainwashed young recruits into joining his Unification Church and then
paired up his followers in mass marriages where Moon would preside wearing lavish
costumes and crowns.

But Moon also understood the importance of political clout. In 1978, a congressional
investigation identified Moon as a part of a covert influence-buying scheme aimed at
American institutions and run by the South Korean Central Intelligence Agency, a
charge that Moon denied.

In 1982, Moon was convicted of tax fraud and served an 18-month sentence in
federal prison. Nevertheless, his political influence grew when he launched The
Washington Times, also in 1982.

In the years that followed, Moon developed a reputation for financing
all-expense-paid international conferences for conservative politicians, prominent
journalists and influential academics.

Moon’s conservative newspaper grew in importance in Washington through the
1980s and early 1990s, as it staunchly supported Republican presidents Ronald
Reagan and George H.W. Bush.

In 1991, President Bush expressed his gratitude to Moon’s newspaper by inviting its
editor, Wesley Pruden, to a private White House lunch “just to tell you how valuable
the Times has become in Washington, where we read it every day.” [Washington
Times, May 17, 1992]

Moving North

At about the same time as that lunch, Moon was beginning another initiative –
establishing a business foothold in North Korea. The DIA, the Pentagon agency
responsible for monitoring possible military threats to the United States, started
keeping tabs on these developments.

Though historically an ardent anticommunist, Moon negotiated a sweeping business
deal with Kim Il Sung, the longtime communist leader, the DIA documents said. The
two men met face-to-face in North Korea from Nov. 30 to Dec. 8, 1991.

“These talks took place secretly, without the knowledge of the South Korean
government,” the DIA wrote on Feb. 2, 1994. “In the original deal with Kim [Il Sung],
Moon paid several tens of million dollars as a down-payment into an overseas
account,” the DIA said in another cable dated Aug. 14, 1994.

The DIA said Moon's organization also delivered money to Kim Il Sung's son and
successor, Kim Jong Il.

“In 1993, the Unification Church sold a piece of property located in Pennsylvania,”
the DIA reported on Sept. 9, 1994. “The profit on the sale, approximately $3 million
was sent through a bank in China to the Hong Kong branch of the KS [South
Korean] company ‘Samsung Group.’ The money was later presented to Kim Jung Il
[Kim Jong Il] as a birthday present.”

After Kim Il Sung's death in 1994 and his succession by his son, Kim Jong Il, Moon
dispatched his longtime aide, Bo Hi Pak, to ensure that the business deals were
still on track with Kim Jong Il “and his coterie,” the DIA reported.

“If necessary, Moon authorized Pak to deposit a second payment for Kim Jong Il,”
the DIA wrote.

As described by the DIA, Moon's deal with North Korea called for construction of a
hotel complex in Pyongyang as well as a new Holy Land at the site of Moon’s birth
in North Korea.

“There was an agreement regarding economic cooperation for the reconstruction of
KN's [North Korea's] economy which included establishment of a joint venture to
develop tourism at Kimkangsan, KN [North Korea]; investment in the Tumangang
River Development; and investment to construct the light industry base at Wonsan,
KN. It is believed that during their meeting Mun [Moon] donated 450 billion yen to
KN,” one DIA report said.

In late 1991, the Japanese yen traded at about 130 yen to the U.S. dollar, meaning
Moon's investment would have been about $3.5 billion, if the DIA information is
correct.

Pak's Response

Contacted in Seoul, South Korea, Bo Hi Pak, a former publisher of The Washington
Times, acknowledged that Moon met with North Korean officials and negotiated
business deals with them in the early 1990s.

But Bo Hi Pak denied that payments were made to individual North Korean leaders
and called “absolutely untrue” the DIA's description of the $3 million land sale
benefiting Kim Jong Il. Bo Hi Pak also said the North Korean business investments
were structured through South Korean entities.

“Rev. Moon is not doing this in his own name,” said Pak.

Pak said he did go to North Korea in 1994, after Kim Il Sung’s death, but only to
express “condolences” to Kim Jong Il on behalf of Moon and his wife. Pak denied
that another purpose of the trip was to pass money to Kim Jong Il or to his
associates.

In the phone interview, Bo Hi Pak also denied that Moon’s investments ever
approached $3.5 billion. Pak did not give a total figure for the investments, but said
the initial phase of an automobile factory was in the range of $3 million to $6 million.

The DIA depicted Moon's business plans in North Korea as much grander, however.
The DIA valued the agreement for hotels in Pyongyang and the resort in
Kumgang-san, alone, at $500 million. The plans also called for creation of a kind of
Vatican City covering Moon's birthplace.

“In consideration of Mun's [Moon's] economic cooperation, Kim [Il Sung] granted
Mun a 99-year lease on a 9 square kilometer parcel of land located in Chongchu,
Pyonganpukto, KN. Chongchu is Mun's birthplace and the property will be used as
a center for the Unification Church. It is being referred to as the Holy Land by
Unification Church believers and Mun [h]as been granted extraterritoriality during the
life of the lease.”

North Korean officials clearly valued their relationship with Moon, granting him small
but symbolic favors. Four months after Moon's 1991 meeting with Kim Il Sung, the
communist dictator granted a rare interview to editors from Moon's Washington
Times.

In February 2000, on Moon's 80th birthday, Kim Jong Il sent Moon a gift of rare wild
ginseng, an aromatic root used medicinally, Reuters reported.

Legal Issues

Because of the long-term U.S. embargo against North Korea – eased only last year
– Moon’s alleged payments to the communist leaders raise potential legal issues
for Moon, a South Korean citizen who is a U.S. permanent resident alien.

“Nobody in the United States was supposed to be providing funding to anybody in
North Korea, period, under the Treasury (Department's) sanction regime,” said
Jonathan Winer, former deputy assistant secretary of state handling international
crime.

The U.S. embargo of North Korea dates back to the Korean War. With a few
exceptions for humanitarian goods, the embargo barred trade and financial dealings
between North Korea and “all U.S. citizens and permanent residents wherever they
are located, … and all branches, subsidiaries and controlled affiliates of U.S.
organizations throughout the world.”

Moon became a permanent resident of the United States in 1973, according to
Justice Department records. Bo Hi Pak said Moon has kept his “green card” status.
Moon maintains a residence near Tarrytown, north of New York City, and controls
dozens of affiliated U.S. companies.

Direct payments to foreign leaders in connection with business deals also could
prompt questions about possible violations of the U.S. Corrupt Practices Act, a
prohibition against overseas bribery.

Political Fallout

Today, however, the potential political fallout might be a greater concern than any
legal action, especially once George W. Bush assumes the presidency.

For the past two years, Republicans have used Rumsfeld's report to club President
Clinton and Vice President Gore for alleged softness toward a recalcitrant
communist enemy.

In 1999, a House Republican task force followed up the work of Rumsfeld's
commission and declared that North Korea and its missile program had emerged as
a nuclear threat to Japan and possibly the Pacific Northwest of the United States.

"This threat has advanced considerably over the past five years, particularly with the
enhancement of North Korea's missile capabilities," said the Republican task force.
"Unlike five years ago, North Korea can now strike the United States with a missile
that could deliver high explosive, chemical, biological, or possibly nuclear weapons."

Ironically, Moon's newspaper joined in laying the blame for North Korea's progress
at the feet of the Clinton-Gore administration.

"To its list of missed opportunities, the Clinton-Gore administration can now add the
abdication of responsibility for national security," a Washington Times editorial
stated on Sept. 5, 2000.

Not surprisingly the Times did not mention that its founder and financial backer, Sun
Myung Moon, had lent a hand to North Korea by agreeing to multi-million-dollar
business deals and allegedly putting millions of dollars in the personal accounts of
the leaders masterminding the strategic weapons development.

Equally unsurprising, former President George H.W. Bush and his
about-to-be-president son have never explained the family's financial involvement
with Rev. Moon, a messianic leader who has vowed to build a movement powerful
enough to eliminate all individuality and freedom in the United States.

Those questions also aren't likely to come up at the confirmation hearings for
Donald Rumsfeld, who believes that the United States must now pursue an
expensive missile shield to counter the threat posed by North Korea.

Robert Parry is a veteran investigative reporter, who broke many of the Iran-contra
stories in the 1980s for The Associated Press and Newsweek.

###



To: sandintoes who wrote (277218)7/18/2002 1:18:08 AM
From: JEB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Democrat wizards mantra: "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain"!