Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Monica Detwiler who wrote (85316)	7/18/2002 1:33:43 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Respond to of 275872

Paul, re: <How about those AMD market segment share losses> Define "market segment share" as it relates to losses and tell me why you think AMD had them. Did SI kill your old userid for good or may you still get back on some day? -tgp

To: Monica Detwiler who wrote (85316)	7/18/2002 9:32:23 PM
From: pgerassi	Respond to of 275872

Monica: You did not want to see that Total Assets were $48.52 Billion in Q2 - 2000 and Stockholders Equity was $36.6 Billion. Now Total Assets Q2 - 2002 are $43.492 and SE is $35.5 Billion. In two full years of supposed high profits, Intel lost $5.028 Billion in Total Assets and $1.1 Billion in Stockholder's Equity. You have to go back to the K6 days to get enough profit to overtake Intel's recent declines. Lowering Taxes, making Goodwill stay the same when it obviously declined (or always was valued at zero) and other noted tactics has Intel scrambling to continue the fiction that "its GREAT!" and "Profitable for the last xx quarters" when decent measures show that it is losing money fast now. When will you acknowledge this? The same time that Intel becomes another Presto? $10 billion in cash, virtually nothing else of an asset but, the name and the SEC forcing it acknowledge that it is really a Mutual Fund. Well Mutual funds rarely get 70 times "sham" earnings. Look out below!!! Pete