Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rich4eagle who wrote (277678)	7/18/2002 11:46:24 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Pilot's Tale of March 29 Christopher Ruddy Tuesday, July 9, 2002 newsmax.com I have no doubt that jet planes still remain vulnerable to hijackings and terrorism, especially after recent press reports and information provided to me by a major airline pilot. Last week, it was revealed that terrorists may be stealing pilot uniforms and identifications, and have been trailing pilots in Europe. And on March 29 of this year, terrorists may have been testing our airline defenses to undertake another bold attack. Those who think al-Qaeda is finished with jets are wrong. We know, for example, that a shoe bomber tried to blow up an American Airlines flight. Past experience also shows that al-Qaeda likes to repeat success. Car bombings are not done just once, they are common practice. Hijacking a plane, again, and crashing it into a building, again, would be just the type of audacious goal al-Qaeda would love to accomplish. You might think that would be difficult to do with heightened security. Think again. Our security measures may actually make it easier. Consider that despite brutal hijackings, the U.S. government still refuses to arm pilots. Despite the pleadings of the pilots, despite the pleading of terrorist experts like Neil Livingstone, the pilots are still unarmed. Political correctness gone mad has created a major loophole for would-be terrorists. Rather than arm pilots, the U.S. government has said it will a) strengthen cockpit doors and b) put a sky marshal on every flight. But everyone knows that every flight does not have a sky marshal, and with 100,000 marshals needed to cover every U.S. flight, this will be a most difficult challenge. Consider for a moment if one or more terrorists, perhaps with the help of Fifth Columnist airport workers, smuggles one or more guns onto a plane. To secure complete control of the jet, all the terrorist needs to do is gain access to the cockpit and kill the pilots. Once in the cockpit, the terrorist simply secures the cockpit door. The hijacker will be safely ensconced in the secure cockpit. A terrified group of passengers would be powerless behind the now secure cockpit doors. How does a terrorist with a gun gain access to the cockpit? As anyone who has flown first class or business class since 9-11 knows, pilots continue to leave the cockpits to go to the bathroom or to communicate with crew. If an armed terrorist sitting in first class seizes the moment, he could easily kill the exiting pilot, enter the cockpit, kill the remaining pilot, and simply lock the door to the cockpit. Sound far-fetched? In April I received an e-mail from a pilot for one of the top three airlines. It confirmed my worries. The pilot wrote: "I am a pilot for [name not revealed] Airlines. And I have information about a flight that took place on Friday, March 29. This flight probably had terrorists on board who were testing our defenses against them and were riding around the system checking out other airlines' responses to their presence." The pilot gave me his phone number and we chatted. He said he was not on any of the flights in question, but that his buddy was a co-pilot on one leg flown by possible terrorists. The pilot told me that on March 29, two Arab men flew from London to Newark after purchasing first-class tickets with cash. The pair then flew to a south Florida city. Leaving Florida from still another city, they flew to New York and then back to France. The pilot said that the men had several passports and didn't bother to pack luggage. The crew in Newark were apparently so worried they didn't want to leave the terminal, but security there said there was no evidence the men were terrorists and they had to be allowed to fly. The pilot said that during the flight from Newark to Florida, one of the Arab men did something very suspicious. He said that when the cockpit door opened as a pilot exited, one of the men abruptly stood up. The passenger's abrupt movement caught the attention of the attendant, who quickly asked the man what he was doing. The man's tense disposition quickly dissipated as he said he was just getting up to use the lavatory. As we know, nothing happened that day. But it may have been a test and a warning. More pause for us to ask why the pilots are still not armed.

To: rich4eagle who wrote (277678)	7/18/2002 11:55:04 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Rich, you may be the richest person in America, but you're still locked into one way of thinking. The range of your ability to critically think, follows the Democrat talking points and that's about it. Is everyone who posts an article challenging the politically correct "Big Media" version of violent acts involving different races a "racist" to you richie? That kind of silly rhetoric might work in your typical high school debate class, but it's empty headed silliness here.