SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (168477)7/19/2002 12:26:36 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Maybe the best explanation for no growth in inventory is that the first generation or two of 0.13 output had extremely low yields or a circuit design problem.

Well John we know this can't be true because Jerry told us AMD has "the BEST yields in the world". Not just good yields but the BEST. You know Jerry is an honest man and I know Jerry is an honest man so why would you even suggest such a thing?

EP



To: Petz who wrote (168477)7/19/2002 12:54:30 AM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 186894
 
Well the Asian subsidiary is wholly owned, I believe, so whatever their holding awaiting sale back to AMD is still inventory and has to be valued at something. If its finished product, it probably has to be valued at expected sale price.

The reporting requirements as well as the reporting cycle would be governed by foreign law.

EP



To: Petz who wrote (168477)7/19/2002 6:37:00 AM
From: Dave  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
John,

Maybe the best explanation for no growth in inventory is that the first generation or two of 0.13 output had extremely low yields or a circuit design problem

That could be the "other" scenario.

Did they migrate over to .13u in the 2nd Quarter?