SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (53288)7/19/2002 12:37:17 AM
From: average joe  Respond to of 82486
 
I read an account of a lawyer admonished by his law society for lack of a better word fornicating with his secretary in a court house closet. The law society said the two carried on in "full view of the robes" as if it was a criminal act in front of court robes but in a seedy motel would have been ok. I have no idea why your banter with X reminded me of this story.



To: The Philosopher who wrote (53288)7/19/2002 9:15:08 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
They are not equal because in one case you are imposing your religion, in the other you are refraining from oposing religion, any religion, or belief (except the belief that the government should not impose any belief)- if you made religious people recite some pledge that said there was no God, THEN you would be imposing religion. Perhaps you will see it now. Or not.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News