SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : NPCT (old SUNY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mmmary who wrote (852)7/19/2002 11:45:59 AM
From: mmmary  Respond to of 1275
 
~*~UNPAID DD ON NPCT PART THREE~*~

105 METZINGER, PAUL codc 1:1989cv00227 02/08/1989 850 02/23/1989
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE vs. PAUL METZINGER

U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 91-CV-65

Kanchanapoom, et al v. Zufelt, et al

Filed: 01/14/91
Assigned to: Judge Sherman G. Finesilver
Jury demand: Both
Demand: $5,000,000
Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt # in USDC C Dist CA : is CV89-7321-RMT (Ex)
Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

PAUL METZINGER Paul H. Metzinger
defendant [COR LD NTC]
Paul H. Metzinger, P.C.
600 - 17th Street
#2309-S
Denver, CO 80202
U.S.A.
303-592-1010
PAUL METZINGER, P.C. Paul H. Metzinger
defendant (See above)
[COR LD NTC]

2/5/91 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Richard Metzinger,
defendant Robert H. Burgener, defendant E.M.I. Inc.,
defendant Crown, Ltd., defendant King, Ltd., defendant Sid,
Ltd. by Timothy James O'Connor, Mary Frances O'Connor (yk)
[Entry date 02/06/91]

It is ordered that the
second cause of action is dismissd as to Paul H. Metzinger
and Paul H. Metzinger, P.C. and First Trust Corp. It is
ordered tht the 8th and 12th causes of action are
dismissed.

U.S. District Court

U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 96-CV-1300

Maxam Gold Corp v. Timberline Conslts, et al

Filed: 06/03/96
Assigned to: Judge Clarence A. Brimmer
Jury demand: Defendant
Demand: $1,667,000
Nature of Suit: 190
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

MAXAM GOLD CORPORATION Michael H. Berger
fka [COR LD NTC]
Maxam International Waldbaum, Corn, Koff, Berger &
Corporation Cohen, P.C.
plaintiff 303 East 17th Avenue
#940
Denver, CO 80203
U.S.A.
303-861-1166
Raymond Harris
[COR LD NTC]
(To be updated)
Cary Ira Schachter
[COR LD NTC]
Conant, Whittenburg, French &
Schachter, PC
600 North Pearl Street
#2300
Dallas, TX 75201
USA
214-999-5100
FTS 999-5747
v.
TIMBERLINE CONSULTANTS, INC. John Henry Schlie
defendant [COR LD NTC]
John H. Schlie, Atty at Law
1120 Lincoln Street
#1600
Denver, CO 80203
USA
303-832-6890
RON KNITTLE John Henry Schlie
defendant (See above)
[COR LD NTC]
PAUL METZINGER John Henry Schlie
defendant [term 10/09/96]
[term 12/23/96] (See above)

He was sued over stock certificates.
U.S. District Court

District of Utah (Central)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 88-CV-897

SEC v. Faspaq, Inc., et al

Filed: 09/30/88
Assigned to: Judge Bruce S. Jenkins
Jury demand: Defendant
Demand: $0,000
Nature of Suit: 850
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: US Plaintiff
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:77 Securities Fraud

PAUL H. METZINGER
defendant
[term 01/30/89]
The SEC won the case against the main defendant. Paul settled this case along with two others in the settlement agreement noted above.

Check out NPCT thread on Subject 19793 especially the old posts. Look at all the promoters on the IHUB one also investorshub.com
Look at all the promoters here on Raging Bull. ragingbull.lycos.com

I have no shares. I have not been paid to post. I am not short. I just hate seeing people being fleeced by stock promoters. This company seems very suspect to me because of management's history and the fact they have no real income. If their patents were so hot, why wouldn't someone buy them or license them for millions? Why couldn't they have gotten a loan against the patents instead of the toxic funding? Why would they have sooo many stock promoters? When you see stock promoters saying this is a $60 stock when they're at .66 cents, you just KNOW something is funny here. As per Asensio's book "Sold Short" this company has almost ALL the signs of a stock scam, i.e. little or no revenue, a hot hot field, management with a bad past, restated earnings, change in auditors, lots of stock promoters, a hard to define product, lots of fluffy press releases, a past involving a mining company...

Sources of information

All legal information about lawsuits came from here. It's a pay site so you need an account, only 7 cents a page. Well worth it to do your DD on your investments.
pacer.uspci.uscourts.gov

All SEC information came from their SEC filings. I use this source
amex.com

If you have questions, feel free to email me. mmmaryinla@aol.com