SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (2608)7/19/2002 11:52:28 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
In Ecuador's Banana Fields, Child Labor Is Key to Profits

[This is a lead story from the New York Times last week...My brother who taught english in Ecuador brought it to my attention]

By JUAN FORERO
The New York Times
July 13, 2002

PUERTO INCA, Ecuador — At Los Álamos plantation, it would appear that no expense was spared to produce the Bonita brand Cavendish bananas sold in the United States.

The modern 3,000-acre hacienda in this steamy corner of Ecuador, one of the most efficient in Latin America, employs some 1,300 workers to tend banana plants fed by a state-of-the-art irrigation system.

The owner is Álvaro Noboa, Ecuador's richest man and a worldly bon vivant. He has become the leading candidate for president with the help of a slick marketing campaign that has cast him as a populist friend of the poor. "I love the workers at Los Álamos," Mr. Noboa told local reporters in May, when he announced his candidacy.

But in interviews, a dozen children and many adults spoke of child laborers at Los Álamos, among them a spindly-armed 10-year-old, Esteban Menéndez. "I come here after school and I work here all day," Esteban said. "I have to work to help my father, to help him make money."

The presence of children on the plantation of a man who may win Ecuador's presidential election in October is one of the more glaring examples of how enduring the use of child labor remains in Latin America, where some 42 million children from ages 5 to 14 have been estimated to be working in recent years.

The problem has been made more durable still by the competition that comes with a consolidated global market. Pressures on businesses to be efficient and profitable are often passed on to the world's most vulnerable population, its poorest children.

Growers and exporters here, who supply 25 percent of the bananas eaten in the United States, say the product earns them about 30 percent less today than a decade ago, often prompting them to turn a blind eye to labor codes. Child labor is common on plantations, large and small.

Meanwhile, grim economic realities leave families more than ready to send their boys, and sometimes girls, out to work, even if it means pulling them out of school and placing them in fields or factories where they are exposed to hazardous conditions for little or no pay.

For two years, Esteban and his family say, the boy has bounded up 15-foot banana plants, tying insecticide-laced cords between them to stabilize trunks that might otherwise collapse under the weight of the produce that is behind Mr. Noboa's fortune of over $1 billion.

He works for nothing to help his father, who tends 98 acres, avoid having his pay docked.

"That is the life of my sons, working in the bananas at such a young age," said Esteban's mother, Benita Menéndez, 36, who has had three sons working at Mr. Noboa's plantation, only one of them an adult. "I did not want them to work when they were little, but this is the reality."

Ecuador's problem is less severe than that of other countries in the region. Even so, the International Labor Organization estimated that 69,000 children ages 10 to 14, and an additional 325,000 young people ages 15 to 19, were working here in 1999.

Only a significant increase in wages, at best a distant prospect in a country where the average worker earns $5.74 a day, will keep families from sending their children out into the fields, labor advocates here and in the United States say.

But while rights activists regard such labor as unacceptable, many parents like Mr. and Mrs. Menéndez see it as a necessity.

When several plantations, fearing unwanted attention, dismissed their child workers after a damning 114-page report in April by Human Rights Watch, the action was taken as a disaster by families across the lush banana belt of southern Ecuador — the world's largest banana exporter and an increasingly important source for American corporations like Dole and Del Monte, according to the report.

"They fired all the children, but the work they did helped us," complained María Narváez, 31, whose two sons, Néstor and Luis Boa, 12 and 13, were dismissed from a big hacienda where they earned $3 a day. "The situation is such that we all have to pitch in."

At Los Álamos, which supplies the world's fourth-largest banana company, labor conditions have become increasingly contentious. Employees' efforts to organize for better wages and working conditions led to a violent standoff this year — a dispute that simmers today in the form of an intermittent strike by some families, including Esteban's own.

The workers unionized in March. The company responded by dismissing more than 120 of them.

When the workers occupied part of the hacienda, guards armed with shotguns, some wearing hoods, arrived at 2 a.m. on May 16, according to workers, and fired on some who had refused to move from the entrance gate, wounding two.

The guards, workers said, then entered the grounds and burst into barracks where other workers were sleeping and forced them out.

The next afternoon, workers again gathered at the gate, where they parked a bus across the road to block delivery trucks. The guards confronted them again, this time wounding seven more — including Esteban's father, Bernabé Menéndez — and a policeman.

"It was an attack on innocent people," said Jan Nimmo, a Scottish labor advocate who was with the workers that day and videotaped the afternoon confrontation at the gate.

Mr. Noboa's lawyer, Rafael Pino, attributed the violence to the workers, saying the guards had been sent in to protect property that was being vandalized. "At no moment were there shots from our side," he said.

But the violence prompted the United States Embassy to ask the government to ensure the safety of the striking workers. An American delegation that included two members of Congressional staffs visited Los Álamos workers in June.

"This is sort of the underbelly of globalization," said Representative George Miller, a California Democrat who sent an aide to Ecuador.

"We ask for labor protections and we ask for environmental protections," Mr. Miller said, "and we're told we can't have them, and when the citizens of that country try to get those protections, they're met with force from the company to keep that from happening."

(Page 2 of 2)

After the confrontation at Los Álamos, a Chicago-based labor rights group, the U.S./Labor Education in the Americas Project, began pressing Costco, a distributor of Bonita bananas, to lean on Mr. Noboa to improve labor conditions.

Under pressure, his banana company has promised to improve medical services, provide masks, gloves and other equipment and settle complaints about unpaid overtime wages. But it has refused to recognize the workers' unions, Labor Ministry officials said.

Mr. Noboa, who divides much of his time between Guayaquil and New York, declined to be interviewed, and campaign aides did not return phone calls and e-mail messages seeking comment. But his lawyer, Mr. Pino, said children under 14, who are tightly restricted from working under Ecuador's labor laws, did not work at Los Álamos. "Impossible," he said in an interview. "To violate the law cannot be done, and it is not the company policy either."

Though no one knows exactly how many children work on the large plantations across Ecuador, Sergio Seminario, an analyst and former president of the Association of Banana Exporters, estimated 6,000, with thousands more working on small family farms.

The Labor Ministry has long been aware of the problem in the industry, which accounts for 20 percent of Ecuador's exports. But Alberto Montalvo, the highest-ranking ministry official in this region, said it was difficult to root out. "We all believe in human rights and labor rights," he said. "It is all very beautiful, but we also have to recognize that all the members of families have to work to pay for basic needs."

The existence of child labor on plantations is a product of simple arithmetic. Workers receive so little in part because the wholesalers and retailers abroad reap most of the profits, particularly with the recent consolidation of huge retail outlets like Wal-Mart, Costco and Carrefour.

Each 43-pound box of bananas purchased here by exporters for $2 or $3 goes for $25 in the United States or Europe. The Ecuadorean grower makes 12 cents on the dollar, according to the National Association of Banana Growers. "These big chains say, `We will buy your bananas off the boat, but at our price,' " Mr. Seminario said. "So the exporter has learned that to sell to those chains he must sell at their price."

If the growers are squeezed, the banana workers feel the pain. Their work force is almost entirely nonunion, and workers are often deliberately shifted from one payroll to another by growers who set up multiple companies on paper to avoid paying benefits and higher wages.

The workers and their children here said difficult conditions had long been the norm at Los Álamos. The families who live here in Puerto Inca cram themselves into crude cinder-block houses with tin roofs. Indoor plumbing is rare.

The main earners among several families said they received $6 to $7 a day — within Ecuador's minimum wage of $128 a month — but were often expected to work six or seven days a week, failing to earn the overtime pay set by law.

The monthly minimum they earn falls far short of the $220 the government says a poor family of four needs to meet basic needs, so children go to work.

"With my husband's salary, we did not have enough for school, not enough for food," said Patricia Céspedes, explaining why she had pulled her nephew out of school at age 11 and sent him to work at Mr. Noboa's hacienda. The boy, Máximo Gómez, whom Ms. Céspedes has raised since his mother's death, is now 14 and a veteran field hand.

Esteban goes to school in addition to working. But many families say they earn so little that they must choose which of their children to educate and which to send into the factories and fields. Such economic necessity keeps 55 percent of Ecuadorean children from attending secondary school, the World Bank says.

Mr. Noboa remains a frequent visitor to New York, where, according to his spokesman, Pablo Martínez, he mingles with the Rockefellers and other luminaries. When his son was christened at St. Patrick's Cathedral last year, an event shown on Ecuadorean television, Robert Kennedy Jr. served as the godfather.

But Mr. Noboa's great hope is to reach the presidency, which he failed to win in 1998. Mr. Noboa has portrayed himself as an outsider whose policies will improve life for most Ecuadoreans.

He has made no extensive public remarks about the dispute with the workers at Los Álamos. In fact, the poor labor conditions and the existence of child workers have made barely a political ripple here. An investigation of the shootings at Los Álamos has not led to any arrests, nor has it shed light on what happened.

Mr. Noboa's aides say the troubles on his hacienda are politically motivated efforts to embarrass him in the midst of a presidential campaign.

"If he wasn't running for president and wasn't the richest man in Ecuador, this wouldn't be happening," Mr. Martínez said.

nytimes.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (2608)7/19/2002 11:58:56 AM
From: mt_mike  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Does the looting begin when the Dow goes below 8000 or 7000. I can just picture yuppies running through suburban malls grabbing TVs and DVD palyers and then carrying them away in their SUVs.
On a serious note, how far do you think the Dow goes eventually. Do you think we go back to the irrational exhuberance starting point. What do the TA charts say.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (2608)7/19/2002 12:15:26 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
French sources: U.S. to attack Iraq 'soon'

[Wag the Dog part II may be closer than we expect <VBG>]

By Amir Oren
HA'ARETZ
Friday, July 19, 2002 Av 10, 5762 Israel Time: 19:07 (GMT+3)

haaretzdaily.com

The U.S. operation to topple Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein will take place in the coming months, even before November's Congressional elections, according to high-level sources in the French government following talks with American decision-makers and professionals in Washington.

The French assessment is based, in part, on what National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice told new French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin this month. Rice emphasized U.S. President George W. Bush's determination to topple Saddam "soon," according to the French sources.

Frequent media reports about difficulties in deploying American troops and completing preparations for the operation are meant, according to French government experts, as disinformation to achieve tactical surprise with regard to the timing, place and method of the assault. This will partly make up for the lack of strategic surprise given Bush's declared policy and Saddam's preparations to absorb an attack.

Reports and analysis based on official sources in Washington reiterate the assumption that the operation will take place this winter, so that any failure will not reflect badly for the Republicans at the polls. But the French regard that as a strategy to lower Saddam's guard in the coming three months, while Congress is in recess and the election campaign heats up. Paris won't be surprised if the blow comes in the middle of August, while Bush is seen vacationing at his Texas ranch, in the form of a special forces raid backed by the CIA and precision air attacks.

The French officials believe the the chances are good for an American operation to succeed, since it will take far less effort than the 1991 Gulf War when Iraq was expelled from Kuwait. But the officials do have their doubts about the U.S.'s ability to form a government to their liking in Baghdad. That skepticism is derived from both the weak opposition to Saddam inside Iraq and the failure to protect the new Afghan government. The officials said they won't be surprised if Afghani President Hamid Karzai, like his vice president, is assassinated. "And we don't know what will happen then to the gamble the Americans took on Karzai."

In the Foreign and Defense ministries in Paris, officials are more worried about Iranian nuclear ambitions. French experts say that Iran won't forgo its nuclear ambitions, and they expect, at the current rate of development, Tehran will have a bomb by 2008 or 2010, three-to-five years after Israel believes the Iranian nuclear program will reach fruition. But Iran can accelerate its project, with foreign help, especially from North Korea. "The Iranians tell us they're only doing what we did 50 years ago," said one French official, adding, "and what you Israelis did, with a bit of help from us. That may be true, but global politics is not based on absolute justice and equality, and even if Sharon has a bomb, that's nonetheless less worrisome than if [Iranian President Mohammed] Khatami has one."

France's traditional reservations about a military operation against Iraq have been blatantly weakened in the weeks since French President Jacques Chirac was re-elected without the need for power sharing with the Left. Bush's military doctrine, which calls for a preemptive strike against countries and entities that might use terror or weapons of mass destruction, is accepted by Paris despite its reticence. "If we know that Libya is going to launch a missile at Marseilles, we won't wait until [Libyan leader Moammar] Gadhafi pushes the button, but why say so ahead of time?" said one strategic planner in the French Foreign Ministry this week.

One of his colleagues added that his government now tilts toward welcoming an American decision to topple Saddam, both because of the general intra-Arab politics and within the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For the Arab world, the collapse of dictatorial or dynastic regimes and intensification of the democratic process will eventually sweep through countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia. France is worried that without an added degree of democracy, the political protests could be channeled into Islamic fundamentalism and result in civil wars, which would send hundreds of thousands of refugees onto the country's southern beaches seeking asylum.

Regarding the Israeli-Palestinian context, the establishment of a pro-Western government in Baghdad would loosen the stranglehold on Jordan, "which is, in effect, only a buffer-state between Iraq and Israel and is run with the inspiration of the IDF and Mossad," said one French source. Without an Iraq hostile to Israel breathing down Jordan's neck, the Palestinians would have to sober up from their far-reaching illusions and chances would grow for an arrangement that suits the needs of all three sides - Jordan, the Palestinians and Israel. And an end to PA Chairman Yasser Arafat's regime is also now acceptable to France's planners, in the spirit of the "change the regime" rule Bush set in place in Kabul and his plans for Baghdad. If it's good for them, why not for Ramallah, say the French officials.

A French source as informed as any about Chirac's closed-door views, told Israel's Ambassador to France, Eli Bar-Navi, that Chirac is disappointed in Arafat, referring to him as "the rug salesman," a euphemism for someone who cannot be trusted.