SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (168508)7/19/2002 4:54:49 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
It was the same way with Enron, it was the same way with Worldcom, and it was even the same way with Clinton. Lying for self-gain, and the apologists say, "Well, that's the real world, so live with it." No thanks.

Yes, this is the Clinton legacy. Well I feel the same way you do, lying is not ok and if Andy Grove or Craig Barrett ever behaved that way I'd want them run out of town too.

EP



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (168508)7/19/2002 6:49:07 PM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ten
if you are not comparing intel to enron you should not compare amd to enron either. There are far more similarities between new intel practices and enron/wcom than between amd and enron. I dislike Jerry myself for many reason but compare to Intel he is a saint. Sorry....
-Albert



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (168508)7/20/2002 8:58:23 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
"Exactly. Unfortunately, the extent of the problem goes WAY beyond Jerry Sanders and AMD. The whole culture of lying for self-gain is at fault here."
"Lying for self-gain, and the apologists say, "Well, that's the real world, so live with it." No thanks."

You must be talking about Elmer? What a hypocrite.

And which one of you squealed to the S.I. police, so
I was suspended for few days?

- Ali