SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gottfried who wrote (15297)7/19/2002 11:03:28 PM
From: pvz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23153
 
Gottfried, thanks for the link. It was exactly what I was looking for. I have calculated it myself going back to 1987, but don't have the data before then.

If you're going to rant, I'll add my own. You mention that interest rates affect the PE allowed. Well, people who talk about the historical mean of 15, NEVER put this statement into the context of prevailing interest rates.

You're right that trailing is easier and therefore probably the one used. I can see some use in using trailing earnings within one sector, but applied to an entire market, I'm convinced it's meaningless, particularly when there are big earnings fluctuations between the periods.

pvz



To: Gottfried who wrote (15297)7/20/2002 12:56:05 AM
From: Sweet Ol  Respond to of 23153
 
Steve Lee has a thread that computes the Naz 100 PE ratio. It is not easy, but he is making an effort. Take a look.

Subject 51697

So far he just has the top 70 companies. The Trailing PE is 40 and the Forward PE is 31. This is for companies that mostly have negative growth. What is wrong with this picture?

Best to all,

JRH