Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (38180)	7/20/2002 6:54:13 PM
From: XBrit	Respond to of 52237

Yes, that is correct as far as I know... Jim Stack has actually got it way wrong the past 12+ months. I subscribed to Stack's newsletter for 6 months in late 2001. He was basically saying "don't fight the Fed" month after month. IMO he had it right until about mid-2001, in being bearish on a few-month timescale... that's the success that Kangas was praising him for. But he totaly misunderstood that we are unwinding a historic bubble... he just tried to apply the conventional reasoning and his regular indicator analysis, as appropriate for garden variety 1945-1995 recessions. Of course the result was that he ended up turning bullish about 2 years and 5000 Dow points too early. Similar to Don Hays' debacle. That's why I dropped my subscription... he disagreed with the CFZ and the CFZ is always right, LOL.

To: AllansAlias who wrote (38180)	7/20/2002 8:06:08 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 52237

Another smartass SI GURU shoots his mouth off, Mr.AA. I have zero reason to trust your remarks.LG,AA and BB, the we are always right except when we are wrong, which we never admit too, but will take potshots at everyone else because we are so damned brilliant.gag me. Max

To: AllansAlias who wrote (38180)	7/21/2002 1:53:36 AM
From: Vitas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

here's the McClellan summation pattern that resembles the 1932 pattern that I referred to last week, along with other charts: geocities.com I call it a triple summation slammation pattern that has evolved into a quadruple pattern. The black TL is the triple part, the red TL the quadruple part. The first 2 charts are the NYA weekly, linear and semi-log. The fib lines are from December 1994 to September 2000 Perhaps you could give us a wave count. The a-d line has nudged the 1982 - 1994 trendline. Compare the 1 percent udv pattern to the 1970 pattern. The last chart, the cumulative up down volume ratio chart does not look like it has any place to stop soon, going back to the previous uptrend in 1997. The 40 year cycle, 23 years of up and 17 years of sideways to down, is not the 1962 pattern. It may be the 1877 pattern: geocities.com I'm heading to the beach this morning.