Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nsumir81 who wrote (96573)	7/20/2002 9:50:48 PM
From: SirRealist	Respond to of 99280

Thx; I shoulda read this before I posted much of the same points.

To: nsumir81 who wrote (96573)	7/20/2002 11:26:46 PM
From: SOROS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99280

I obviously see a much greater connection between the moral decline and the character of Clinton and DIRECT invention of the "new economy" under his watch. This "bubble" was not chance. It was created. It was directed. The acceleration of the moral breakdown was not chance. It was directed. I maintain that Clinton had a direct hand in both of these factors. You maintain that it was simply an "evolution" that would have taken place no matter who was President for the past 10 years. I think it would have continued in that path, but I KNOW it escalated exponentially under Clinton. What other President who was rumored or caught in lies, deception, or moral troubles had the SUPPORT of the American people in these acts? I did not say simply the gesture of ignoring or keeping the acts quiet. I said the CONDONING of the ACTS themselves simply because the economy was strong and the stock market was going up. If you cannot see that, YOU will remain clueless until the US is a third-rate nation. I remain, SOROS