SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neeka who wrote (278491)7/21/2002 6:29:54 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Halliburton Probe Is Growing Worry for Bush, Hill Republicans

truthout.org

A Liability on the GOP Balance Sheet?
Halliburton Probe Is Growing Worry for Bush, Hill Republicans

By Mike Allen and James V. Grimaldi
Washington Post Staff Writers

Saturday, 20 July, 2002

Rep. Nancy L. Johnson (R-Conn.) power-walked to the back of a Hartford
hotel atrium earlier this week to tell television cameras how thrilled she was
that Vice President Cheney would be arriving any minute to raise $120,000 for
her reelection race.

But instead of being asked about her campaign or the visit, Johnson was
peppered with questions about Cheney's tenure as chief executive of Halliburton
Co. and the Securities and Exchange Commission's investigation of accounting
changes he oversaw. Johnson, insisting that the growing debate over corporate
responsibility is "not just about any one person," wheeled and rushed to the
front of the room to await Cheney's motorcade, reporters calling after her about
the SEC.

As Cheney travels the country to raise money for Republican candidates,
local news coverage has begun to focus on the SEC investigation and
Democrats have begun making an issue of Cheney's lucrative stewardship of
Halliburton. The result is a new vulnerability for President Bush as he struggles
to persuade markets and investors that his administration is committed to
prosecuting corporate fraud. Bush was asked twice about Halliburton during a
news conference on Wednesday.

House Republicans in tight campaigns are increasingly worried that
Democrats will succeed in pinning corporate excesses on them, GOP aides
say, and Cheney has become the focus of that concern.

Cheney has made no statement about Halliburton's accounting or the SEC
investigation, and his counselor, Mary Matalin, said he has no plans to. "The
vice president is not remotely focused on this stale Washington politics," she
said. "He's focused on his job."

"Cheney's silence is deafening," a senior House Republican aide said. "If
there's been one thing that should have been learned from the Clinton era, it
was that these things have to be dealt with immediately, forthrightly and
completely, and failure to do so gives the appearance that there really is
something there. It only intensifies the political agony for all of us."

The controversy comes from a decision made by Halliburton, a Dallas-based
oil services and construction firm, in 1998, when Cheney was chairman and
chief executive. Halliburton began using an accounting technique that resulted
in some uncollected debts being counted as revenue. That made Halliburton's
revenue look larger than it would have with conventional accounting, resulting in
a better bottom line.

Halliburton said the debts, caused by cost overruns on construction
projects, were counted as revenue when "collection is deemed to be probable."
A company spokeswoman said Cheney was aware Halliburton was using the
new method, which was not disclosed to regulators and investors for more than
a year after it was first used.

Lawsuits by investors say the accounting method improperly boosted
revenue by $534 million over the past four years -- which the company said is
only a small part of its revenue.

Several independent accountants said the procedure is unlikely to be found
by the SEC to be improper or illegal. Investigators at the Fort Worth district
office of the SEC are checking, however, to be sure the practice was not used
to cover other questionable accounting. "If the SEC finds out they did a
theoretically correct thing, but then manipulated that to achieve their results,
they will skin their [rear]," said Roman Weil, a University of Chicago accounting
professor.

Cheney has not been contacted by the SEC, his staff said. He has,
however, turned to the Washington law firm Williams & Connolly, according to
attorneys associated with the Halliburton case. Williams & Connolly is the
blue-chip Beltway firm that has represented the Clintons.

Democrats have recently raised many questions about a Harken Energy
Corp. stock sale Bush made in 1990 that prompted an SEC investigation,
which was closed without charges being filed. Cheney's situation is potentially
more damaging to the White House because the investigation is just beginning.

James A. Thurber, American University's director of the Center for
Congressional and Presidential Studies, said the issue "could undermine
people's trust in Cheney and make it harder for the administration to move
ahead with its own agenda."

White House officials realize that Halliburton questions will be with them for
some time and have settled on a two-pronged strategy for dealing with them.
The first is to paint them as purely political, driven in part by Democrats'
presidential ambitions. When asked about the possibility that Senate
Democrats will hold hearings on Halliburton, White House press secretary Ari
Fleischer accused the president's opponents of engaging in "old-style
Washington antics at a time when our nation is sick and tired of that."

The other strategy, used by Bush during the news conference, is to use any
question about Harken or Halliburton as an opportunity to discuss Bush's
economic plans. "That's not a distraction, that's an opportunity," a Bush aide
said.

Ralph Reed, a political consultant and chairman of the Georgia Republican
Party, said Cheney remains "other than the president, as strong a draw at the
grass roots as exists in the party today." And White House officials say the
Halliburton questions have done nothing to detract from Cheney's in-house
effectiveness.

However, the controversy has made the always stealthy Cheney even
tougher to spot. While he often stands at Bush's side for major
announcements, he was nowhere to be found last week when Bush unveiled his
corporate responsibility proposals. And Cheney recently took two unannounced
trips on government business. He visited troops at Fort Bragg, N.C., last week,
and on Wednesday he flew to Atlanta for a briefing on bioterrorism at the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Cheney plans to spend most of August on vacation in Jackson, Wyo. For
now, though, he continues to aggressively work the fundraising circuit despite
the flak from Democrats. Yesterday, Cheney headlined his 44th money-raising
event of the year.

Democratic strategists are urging their candidates to play up the Halliburton
questions. "If you have senior citizens outside a Cheney event, demonstrating
about corporate responsibility, that's most likely to get on the 6 o'clock news
than if they're demonstrating about Social Security," said Jenny Backus, press
secretary of the House Democratic campaign committee.

Before Cheney arrived in Pennsylvania on Thursday to campaign for state
Sen. Jim Gerlach, the Republican nominee in the new 6th District, Democrats
had already pounced. Dan Wofford, who is Gerlach's opponent and son of
former U.S. senator Harris Wofford, set up a campaign event so he could draw
attention to what he called the "swirling investigations of the troubled Halliburton
Corporation."

Cheney plans to visit Iowa for fundraisers on July 29 and 30, including an
event for Rep. Jim Leach (R-Iowa), who faces a tough reelection campaign after
the redistricting of his longtime base. At least three labor groups are planning
demonstrations outside Cheney's stops.

"Jim Leach hasn't learned what his mother taught him: You're judged by the
friends you keep," said Marcia Nichols, Iowa legislative director of the American
Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

During Cheney's stop in Connecticut on Monday, he waved as he took the
stage, then read a 14-minute speech that included 90 seconds about corporate
responsibility and 7 minutes about the war. He left without shaking hands or
taking questions.

That night, coverage on Hartford television stations was dominated by
discussion of Halliburton, with reporters calling Cheney "a lightning rod" and
saying he "finds himself at the center of the corporate controversy."

Nancy L. Johnson's opponent, Rep. James H. Maloney (D-Conn.), called
Cheney's trip "a net positive for her treasury and a net negative for the message
of her campaign."

"She's embracing somebody who is under investigation," Maloney said.

Staff writer Jonathan Weisman contributed to this report.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.)

Print This Story E-mail This Story

© : t r u t h o u t 2002

| t r u t h o u t | forum | issues | editorial | letters | donate | contact |
| voting rights | environment | budget | children | politics | indigenous survival | energy |
| defense | health | economy | human rights | labor | trade | women | reform | global |

______________________________

bia



To: Neeka who wrote (278491)7/22/2002 12:27:27 AM
From: MSI  Respond to of 769670
 
"Try to find some good in your life."

Good tip. I do that every day, or at least try to, and usually succeed ... in spite of neighbors shooting at unarmed helicopters, terrorist threats and government attempting to establish martial law, there are wonderful things to still appreciate, and to protect.

Dont' misunderstand, I'm a prime beneficiary of this Way of Life, going back a few generations, and am a Americanophile. Once we get past the dangers of an all-powerful central government, IMO innovations will arise in this country that will advance mankind in biology and energy-related sciences that will be remembered for millenia.

But meanwhile there is a temporary abberation caused by concentration of power that will cause economic and political upheaval for a few more years until the covert aspects of government are rooted out by a motivated populace. So many things are occuring that IMO make it obvious citizens have no influence in governing our country, and gov't-business collaboration has other interests than the American people.

If I'm a conspiracy theorist, I get to call you a "coincidence theorist"...<ggg>