Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : World Affairs Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (719)	7/22/2002 11:57:38 AM
From: Thomas M.	Respond to of 3959

No, but US active participation began after Pearl Harbor. Correct, but you originally said: you fellas have concluded the US started WWII Short memory? But I've read about the Rape of Nanking and the Japanese activities seem to have been a bit more blood-thirsty than most other colonial powers. </i. Well, a bit more bloodthirsty is perhaps true. But, it's not like the American conquest of the Philippines (to take one example) was a picnic. Tom

To: Brumar89 who wrote (719)	7/22/2002 12:23:38 PM
From: Thomas M.	Respond to of 3959

[edit] No, but US active participation began after Pearl Harbor. Correct, but you originally said: you fellas have concluded the US started WWII Short memory? But I've read about the Rape of Nanking and the Japanese activities seem to have been a bit more blood-thirsty than most other colonial powers. Well, a bit more bloodthirsty is perhaps true. But, it's not like the American conquest of the Philippines (to take one example) was a picnic. Tom