SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: techanalyst1 who wrote (12953)7/23/2002 11:16:51 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 57684
 
"Wild Day Leaves Dow Under 8000"

Losses Raise Fear of Damage to Economy
By Steven Pearlstein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 23, 2002; Page A01

Another roller-coaster day on global stock markets yesterday left the Dow Jones industrial average below the 8000 mark and economists wondering aloud if the plunge in share prices will bring the real economy down with it.

After a day of heavy trading that saw the blue-chip index swing nearly 400 points during the lunch hour alone, the Dow finished the day off another 234 points, or nearly 3 percent, at 7784.58. Other broad indexes fell to a similar degree, extending a sell-off that has trimmed $1.5 trillion from the value of publicly traded stocks in just the last two weeks, and $7 trillion since stock prices peaked more than two years ago.

The selling yesterday was broad and, at times, indiscriminate, reflecting a massive retreat from stock ownership by individual investors, who have withdrawn more than $30 billion out of stock mutual funds over the past nine weeks, according to AMG Data Services, which tracks fund flows.

The Gallup Organization, meanwhile, said investor optimism has plunged in July to an all-time low.

Pessimism has also spread to European markets, where a broad sell-off has already put major insurance companies on the brink of technical insolvency and threatens to snuff out what was the beginning of a stock-owning culture among the middle class. Leading indexes fell by nearly 5 percent yesterday in London and more than that in Paris and in Frankfurt, Germany.

"Investors are unwilling to try to catch the falling knife," said Thomas Galvin, chief investment officer for Credit Suisse First Boston, reaching into the bag of familiar Wall Street metaphors.

Sunday's announcement by WorldCom Inc. of the biggest corporate bankruptcy filing in U.S. history no doubt contributed to yesterday's sour mood by reminding investors and traders that the fallout from accounting scandals is far from over, with more revelations, indictments and bankruptcies almost sure to follow.

Just yesterday, for example, stock in BellSouth Corp. fell 18 percent after the regional phone monopoly announced that its second-quarter earnings had fallen 67 percent because so many customers are disconnecting their second phone lines and businesses are cutting spending on data transmission. BellSouth is also owed millions of dollars by WorldCom for using its local network to complete long-distance calls. The news dragged down other phone stocks as well.

Investors also hammered the stocks of two of Wall Street's leading investment banks, Citigroup Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., on the eve of Senate hearings into the firms' role in helping Enron Corp. hide its deteriorating financial condition from investors and rating agencies.

Market analysts yesterday were careful not to make any predictions on when the bear market might reach bottom.

The throw-in-the-towel sentiment voiced by growing numbers of individual investors sounds to many like the kind of capitulation that is considered necessary before a new bull market can begin.

But analysts warn that just as momentum was able to carry the markets upward for months at the end of the 1990s even after it was clear to many that stocks were grossly overpriced, the same kind of effect can be expected as stock prices fall.

Others, such as Richard Bernstein of Merrill Lynch & Co., also argue that, even at these levels, stocks remain overpriced when measured against historic averages and the level of current corporate profits.

Among economists, there is also a debate raging over what effect the economy is having on the stock market, and the market on the economy.

The optimists argue that the market and the economy have essentially disconnected from one another in the wake of corporate scandals that have focused investor attention on the reliability of financial statements and the ethics of corporate officials rather than the unmistakable rebound in corporate profits this year. As a result, the stock market, for now, cannot be counted on as a reliable predictor of economic activity.

"The market's performance is no reflection of the economy," declared Merrill Lynch's bullish forecaster, Bruce Steinberg, who predicted that the economy would grow at a robust 4 percent annual rate during the second half of the year.

Steinberg and others acknowledged late last week that the plunge in equity prices would dampen consumer spending and discourage businesses from hiring more workers and making investments in new equipment.

But Steinberg argues that most of those drags on the economy will be offset by the salutary effect of rising home prices and the drop in interest rates that has resulted as stock-weary investors move their money to the relative safety of the bond market. Because rates fall as bond prices rise, the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury bond has dropped by nearly three-quarters of a percentage point over the last two months, to below 4.5 percent.

A similarly upbeat outlook was provided last week by Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan in his semi-annual economic report to Congress.

A growing cadre of pessimists, however, now argue that the stock market is sending an important and credible signal that the economic recovery that began in January has stalled, and the economy could dip back into recession.

"The market is sending a very clear signal that the economy in the second half of this year will be very bad," said James Paulson, economist and chief investment officer at Wells Capital Management.

In Paulson's view, its not just U.S. investors who are capitulating but also U.S. consumers, who have become increasingly unable and unwilling to continue spending beyond their means, particularly as their stock wealth melts before their eyes.

Paulson noted that the growth in demand by consumers and businesses for goods and services is already beginning to decelerate markedly, resulting in a slowdown in economic growth from a 6 percent annual rate in the first quarter of this year to an estimated 2.5 percent rate in the second. And he predicted the annual growth rate would fall to 1 percent or less for the balance of the year.

John Makin, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute, is even more pessimistic.

"Growth in demand is very weak right now," said Makin. "The only way companies are going to be able to deal with that and make any money is to cut costs even further and lay off more workers. And that is only going to reduce demand even further. That's the cycle we're about to enter -- and that is what the stock market is telling us."

Makin says it is now more likely than not that the economy will not only slow, but fall back into recession by the end of the year.

"The economy can't continue to glide along on the cushion of rising house prices and consumer spending," said Robert Dugger, a former Fed economist who is now a partner at Tudor Investment Corp. in Washington. "There will be no sustained recovery until we move away from debt- and consumption-led growth and toward growth that is fueled by savings and investment. We can't get rich by getting any deeper in debt."

Straddling the two camps, economist Robert Barbera at Heonig & Co. said yesterday that the U.S. economy could probably avoid sinking back into recession -- but not if the stock prices fall another 10 or 15 percent.

"I was one of those who said that, because of the accounting problems and corporate scandals, the market would continue to struggle while the economy would do okay," said Barbera. "But if the next 90 days [on the market] are like the last 90, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. At that point, all bets are off."

According to Yale economics professor Robert Shiller, an expert on market volatility, more chaotic days like today are to be expected, particularly in a bear market environment where investors are paying rapt attention.

"Time is sped up when people are paying this kind of attention," he said. "Humans are naturally social animals and have a hard-wired tendency to sense alarm among others and drop everything they are doing and deal with it."

Staff writer Ben White contributed to this report from New York.

© 2002 The Washington Post Company

washingtonpost.com



To: techanalyst1 who wrote (12953)7/23/2002 3:16:56 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57684
 
BIG PICTURE: Does Stock Market Gloom Doom Economy?

23 Jul 13:55
By John McAuley
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Economists had been arguing that the stock market's
decline of the past year was disconnected from a more buoyant economic reality.

It would be up to the market, they said, to adjust upward to bring the two
variables closer into line.

But in light of the transition in the past couple of weeks from an equities
decline to a plunge, some economists are modifying their outlook to incorporate
stock market effects into their economic forecasts. These forecasters now think
the economy will also have to do its bit to get more in line with a harsher
reality suggested by the stock market.

"The problem is we're waiting for another shoe to drop," said Joe LaVorgna,
senior economist at Deutsche Bank. "While there might be a disconnect from the
economic data to the stock market, we worry that the ongoing fall will nip what
we have been believing would be a decent economic expansion."
Like many other economists, LaVorgna is reluctant to make a big change in his
forecast, yet. But there's been a big change in stock market behavior.

"Until two weeks ago, it was a very orderly selloff," he said. "If the stock
market turns around, we could be back to where we were a month ago."
Other economists, like LaVorgna, are reluctant to react too suddenly to a
market move that could turn out to be a blip.

"I think a big (negative) impact on the economy is possible, but not very
likely," said Henry Willmore, chief U.S. economist at Barclay's Capital. "The
main influence is overwhelmingly from the economy to the stock market."
Willmore's forecast is for a 5.0% rate of gross domestic product growth in
the current quarter and 3.0% in fourth quarter.

" I haven't changed my forecast, I don't think these short-term moves mean
very much. I certainly didn't when the stock market declined after Sept. 11,"
he said.

Sands AreShifting

The sanguinity that economists had been showing, however, is definitely
eroding.

"We haven't changed anything yet," said Jim O'Sullivan, senior U.S. economist
at UBS Warburg. "It's not that the stock market doesn't matter, it's just that
we don't want to be changing the forecast every week."
A key reason why O'Sullivan has held off altering his forecast is that he
still sees offsetting positives.

"There's still some offset from the low level of interest rates and there has
been fairly positive momentum in the economic numbers that hasn't been derailed
yet."
Finally, while far from a slave to econometric models based on history,
O'Sullivan does cite the Federal Reserve's macroeconomic model that shows,
based on historical behavior, that a 20% decline in the stock market, by
itself, shows up as a 0.4 percentage point decline in GDP growth in the first
year.

"I'm inclined to think that result understates the effect, but it also
doesn't take into consideration the offsetting softness in interest rates,"
concludes O'Sullivan. Lower interest rates have fueled a strong rally in home
prices, which has boosted households' wealth at the same time that the stock
declines have cut into it.

Some other economists are more worried, however, that the decline that we've
already seen is enough to chip away at the recovery.

"When the stock market plunges as much as it has, it clearly hurts confidence
and has a negative wealth effect," said Sung Won Sohn, chief economist at Wells
Fargo. "I think that there are already some real consequences."
Sohn notes that business confidence has been hurt more than consumer
confidence and that as a result the cost of capital has gone up and some
capital spending and hiring decisions have been delayed.

"Consumers have been less affected so far. The last Fed consumer study found
the average household only owned $11,500 in stocks. They have a much greater
stake in their homes," Sohn said.

Nevertheless, the changes he has made to his forecast are still relatively
cosmetic: lowering third quarter GDP growth to 2% from 3% and trimming fourth
quarter growth to 3% from 3.5%.

Transmission From Stocks To Real Estate

A more pronounced change is noticeable in the outlook of other economists,
who until recently were economic bulls and have now become more bearish.

"Up until last week I wasn't worried by the second quarter stock market
decline, but the drop in July is beginning to worry me," said Ram Bhagavatula,
chief economist at the Royal Bank of Scotland in New York.

The reason Bhagavatula is worried is that he believes credit tightening is
beginning to take place. "The commercial paper market has dried up unless
you're rated Triple-A and banks have already taken hits on Enron and WorldCom.

It's like 1992-93 when credit tightness caused the `head winds' that (Fed
Chairman) Greenspan referred to."
Moreover, he's worried that the decline in one asset market - the stock
market - could transmit to the another asset market - that of residential real
estate.

"Unless the S&P 500 can climb back over 900, fourth quarter GDP growth is at
great risk, possibly of only 1.5%" concludes Bhagavatula.

Another economist who was until recently been an optimist but who is now
hedging his bets is Jim Glassman, senior economist at JPMorgan Securities.

"I think the Fed is keeping interest rates lower than they otherwise would
for a longer period," Glassman said. "I feel like the window of danger is the
fall. If the economy keeps cruising along, however, people will begin to talk
about the interest rate effects being greater than the wealth effects."
"The test that the worst will be over will come when we start talking about
the interest rates are in the wrong zipcode and need to be pushed higher," said
Glassman.

-By John McAuley, Dow Jones Newswire, 201-938-4425; john.mcauley@dowjones.com

(END) DOW JONES NEWS 07-23-02
01:55 PM