Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Digrdug who wrote (27121)	7/23/2002 11:40:42 AM
From: MilesM	Respond to of 34075

Why don't you worry about your boat and let me worry about my investment. Predicting about my financial future Doug? I think that's the best thing you've done since you've been hounding this company and it's investors. Ladies and Gentlemen, Doug McKenzie, the Fortune Teller. For the cost of a positive comment, he'll accurately tell you how stupid you are for trying to make money. Take her easy Doug. Miles

To: Digrdug who wrote (27121)	7/23/2002 11:59:22 AM
From: luvmygoldmine	Respond to of 34075

once again, doug is just trying to confuse people. as everyone heard on the conference call friday, the numbers from the trites and paravacini reports, as I recall about 1.5 g in one and 2.5 g in the other, continue to be THE numbers. terry did, as he always does, in order to be conservative, and to demonstrate profitability even at such ultra conservative numbers, offer .25 grams. this number actually comes from the mine plan submitted to the Overseas Private Investment Company in order to demonstrate that even at ore graces a small fraction of what the studies found, GE would still be very profitable. because it has nothing to do with anything, look to that little swine mckenzie to still talk about "gold in the cobbles." which is something the company has never talked about mining.