Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (148706)	7/23/2002 1:23:09 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575981

However, he will be known for an economy that worked Which he had absolutely nothing to do with. And that's why under your president, we have an economy that's stinking up the joint. You are what you believe. You make is sound as though the economy is some sort of discretely measured item that coincides with presidential elections, rather than the continuum it really is. There is more of a correlation than you think. for reducing the welfare burden A conservative concept, a fundamental premise of Gingrich's Contract With America. You're giving Clinton credit for THAT? That's hilarious. So what, it took Clinton to make it happen. I can't help if you all can't get it together. for bringing unemployment down to its lowest levels in years More economy he had nothing to do with. for advancing the cause of peace in the world Huh? I must have been absent that day. I guess so........... for working towards ecological solutions that benefit the planet etc. Huh (again)? Don't bother your head over this one......its beyond you. But most importantly he will be known for having a brain. No, he will be remembered most importantly for (1) getting impeached, and (2) getting a BJ from a near-teenager whilst conducting business on the telephone. No, he was smart; he could think; he was competent!! I don't think I can wait another 2 years. Even excluding my remarks, do you think the legacy you mentioned is appropriate for an 8-year term? I mean, it can't hold a candle to the legacy of, for example, a Ronald Reagan or a Teddy Roosevelt, or even Richard Nixon (if you leave the lying out of it). You must be kidding.........you can't be real.......ole sweaty face Nixon or B actor Reagan........give me a break. Clinton was an abject failure, even exclusive of the widespread corruption his administration is most known for; and I believe that's what he'll be remembered for. Its understandable now why you like Bush. He's a president you can look down to. In the meantime, get the sucker to do something. You might have him bust a CEO or two.......that might get the markets moving.