SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kech who wrote (122030)7/24/2002 9:36:09 AM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Respond to of 152472
 
yes, i know it is depreciated. i am making a simplistic explanation, which i hope is allowable. however, i think you will realize that once you start depreciating these things, they will quickly accumulate to a 5-10 year rolling average which will not be that much different from just writing the entire amount off up front.

that is why the cos who have announced they will expense options tend to say the effect will be "minimal". what they mean is that it will be minimal the first year. but like as not, they will issue options next year, and the next, and the next. with the result that option expenses will accumulate. i believe KO spelled this out in its options expensing roadmap.



To: kech who wrote (122030)7/24/2002 2:50:21 PM
From: A.L. Reagan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
If it is a long term option grant, that can't be exercised for 5 to 10 years then it is not an expense at the moment it is given.

If you did a Black-Scholes valuation as of the vesting date (not PV'd to the grant date) and there is a period of time over which the option vests, agree that the expense should be charged ratably over the vesting period. But by discounting to the present value and factoring in the probability of forefeitures, you would get a similar answer to the multi-year amortization of a grossed-up amount. In reality, most of these option plans seem to have an annual grant feature.