Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (183201)	7/24/2002 6:40:28 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

it's irrelevant, IMO. '87 was a completely different set of circumstances ...

To: MythMan who wrote (183201)	7/24/2002 9:06:27 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

"it means the low could be in. Emphasis on could." COME ON! Every measure shows that stocks are not earning anywhere near their return to justify such levels. Just because things look low as compared to the bubble high does not mean they are low.. I would like to be more polite, but I have got used to being thought insane and am willing to continue in the role. I don't want to see any perfectly respectable bears cross-dressing. Well, now I guess I'll have to wait another two years before I sound rational again.