Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JPR who wrote (12411)	7/28/2002 8:35:20 AM
From: JPR	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12475

Title: A Beggar or A Terrorist or Both Dawn.com The Powell mission : Editorial page The other day, in fact, Washington virtually rebuffed New Delhi by declaring that Islamabad was playing a crucial role in the world coalition's fight against terrorism. The snub came in the wake of the Indian call to the US to have Pakistan declared a terrorist state. JPR's comment The editorial writers just simply ignored the fact that US is against plebiscite, which Pakistan wants. The writers are simply guilty of omission and commission in their writings. How about this? Let us (US) declare that Pakistan is a beggar state. Is that true or false? The pakis can find more dignity in that characterization-beggar! As long as the paki Butt-heads cooperate with US on fighting terrorism, America won't declare Pakistan as a terrorist state. Yes, it is a fact that the pakis are cooperating with US on fighting terrorism for a few reasons: the pakis want the US pay their bill and forgive the outstanding debt; terrorism might destroy the unity of the nation of Pakistan. Yes, when it comes to stopping infiltrators at the LoC, it is a half-hearted effort, nonetheless an effort to pull the wool over the US eyes. --JPR